Search for: "STATE OF MARYLAND v. STATE OF LOUISIANA"
Results 341 - 360
of 425
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2011, 5:54 am
Supreme Court asking the Court to grant the Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed last month by a group of drug purchasers in Louisiana Wholesale Drug Co., Inc., et al., v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm
Medicaid Services: CUTS IN MEDICAID HOME SERVICES WILL HURT LOUISIANA, SUIT SAYS, Pitts v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
Among these states, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin expressly allow recovery of filial consortium damages pursuant to statute. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am
Maryland, 482 U. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am
Three and a half months later, at the end of March, the Court heard oral argument in cases from five states (Texas, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, and Louisiana) that had enacted new death penalty laws after the Court's 1972 decision in Furman v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 9:00 pm
That is at least the point that comes across from Justice Sotomayor's dissent from a denial of certiorari review in Pitre v. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 7:28 am
" (United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 10:22 am
As noted above, the responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 8:50 pm
Another example of a court order that first approved a transfer of structured settlement payment rights, and later was declared ineffective, comes from the opinion of the United States District Court in Maryland, in a case captioned Rapid Settlements, Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 1:18 pm
Maryland. . . . [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 2:30 am
Seven states have mandatory pro bono reporting (Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Mississippi, Nevada, and New Mexico). [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
Provincial Government of MarinduqueDocket: 09-944Issue(s): Whether federal courts have jurisdiction to rule on a case that involves potential foreign policy issues because a foreign government is involved.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioners' supplemental briefPetitioners' reply Title: Louisiana Safety Association of Timbermen – Self Insurers Fund v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:00 pm
Thompson comes out of Louisiana. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 4:15 am
See, e.g., Fitzgerald v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:28 am
A typical example is a 2007 Washington Supreme Court case called Scott v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
Respondents failed to provide EPA with the required notice, although the State of Rhode Island was notified. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
