Search for: "STATE v ENGLISH"
Results 341 - 360
of 7,321
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2014, 11:00 pm
The English High Court has recently rendered an insightful and thought provoking decision on the application of Art. 4 II and III of the Rome II Regulation (Winrow v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 6:13 am
In Thompson v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 7:14 am
There’s lots to discuss in plain English. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 9:00 pm
The case is Carlos Torres v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:10 am
In McNeill v. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 4:17 pm
The Court could not make an award of “vindicatory” damages, merely to mark the commission of the wrong; this was wrong in principle: see R (Lumba) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] 1 AC 245 [97-100]. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 11:26 am
For example, in Livingston v. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 4:05 pm
Were English law to deny those domiciled, or those who have their centre of interests, in England the same rights and means of remedy as are available to those within EU member states, it will be open to challenge before the European Court of Human Righ [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 7:25 am
Ethicon Ltd [1975] AC 396. [2] Campus Oil v Minister for Industry [1983] IR 38. [3] Okunade v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 9:47 am
EXTREME DUI REDUCED to Regular DUI – State v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm
Bruen and RahimiTwo years ago, in New York State Pistol and Rifle Association v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 11:00 am
Flook, drew this notion in part from Neilson v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 12:04 am
The Decision in UP v Hungary – Achmea does not apply to ICSID Tribunals On 9 October 2018, the Tribunal in UP and CD Holding Internationale v Hungary (ICSID Case No. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 4:16 pm
Gross in Plain English. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 7:04 am
By Maria Kendrick The much awaited High Court judgment of 3 November 20161)R Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin). was an historical decision which saw the Executive’s use of prerogative powers delineated in the context of Treaty making, and unmaking, in a successful Judicial Review against the Government. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 7:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 8:36 am
On May 21, 2012, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Taniguchi v. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 12:31 am
In C v D [2007] EWCA Civ 1282, D insured C under a Bermuda Form policy that provided for London arbitration and was governed by New York Law. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 8:47 am
As I’ll show, United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:50 am
Rosneft resisted this argument on the basis of the English act of state doctrine. [read post]
