Search for: "STATE v. FLOYD"
Results 341 - 360
of 842
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
In the brand-new Court of Appeal decision just out - Actavis UK Ltd & Others v Eli Lilly & Company [2015] EWCA Civ 555 (25 June 2015), Lord Justice Floyd (Lords Justices Kitchin and Longmore concurring) disagreed with Arnold J on two main issues. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 3:59 pm
Vringo also cited the dicta of Mr Justice Floyd (as he then was) in IPCom v Nokia [2009] EWHC 1017 where, when asked to order a trial of a preliminary issue to determine the FRAND licence terms in relation to IPCom's patent in suit, he stated that: "...What is at stake between parties in portfolio patent litigation of this kind is usually the sum of money which will enable the grant of a worldwide licence under the entire portfolio. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 8:22 am
The Supreme Court has accepted a new case from California, Van de Kamp v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 1:40 pm
Accordingly, we affirm the district court's grant of summary judgment against the State. 08a0105p.06 Floyd v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:49 pm
Bradley King and Krisi Robertson in their official Governmental capacities as Co-directors of the Indiana Election Division, et al. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 2:51 am
In May 2013, the Court of Appeal for England and Wales in HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc.[2013] EWCA Civ 451 [on which see Norman Sierbrasse's guest Katpost here] unanimously affirmed Mr Justice Floyd's decision (in HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc. [2012] EWHC1789) with respect to the slide-to-unlock patent and held that “all the claims of 022 [Apple’s slide to unlock patent] are obvious in the light of Neonode” (paragraph 363). [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 10:43 am
Floyd v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 11:46 am
In Basu v. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 7:56 pm
The district court granted summary judgment to defendants on this claim and on various state-law claims that are not at issue on appeal. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 5:18 am
., LLC v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 9:39 am
Jackson explained on behalf of the court in the landmark decision of West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 10:43 am
From Norgren v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 4:25 am
On Wednesday, the Court heard oral arguments in Glossip v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 4:54 am
Read Judge Scheindlin's opinion in the Stop and Frisk case, Floyd v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 5:59 pm
But, he told me, "George Floyd has changed everything. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 5:14 am
Bank National Association v Moss, 186 AD3d 1753, 1753 [2d Dept 2020]; State v Winkle, 179 AD3d 1121, 1126 [2d Dept 2020]). [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 1:17 pm
Tambry and Suzanne were the lead plaintiffs in our case, Young v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 5:49 am
Judge Donald Floyd said he would decide the issue next week. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 8:54 am
The law on added matter was not disputed, having been recently reviewed by Floyd LJ (with Longmore LJ and Lewison LJ both in agreement) in AP Racing Ltd v Alcon Components Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 40 (reported on by this blog here). [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 12:30 am
This was stated in Best Buy v Worldwide Sales Corporation [2000]FSR 686, in which Floyd J expressed concern about “exporting” the threats provisions overseas. [read post]
