Search for: "STATE v. MCKENNA"
Results 341 - 360
of 384
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
”Latest Court of Session opinion on Heather Capital, published 28 February 2017: EXTRA DIVISION, INNER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION[2017] CSIH 19 CA207/14 and CA208/14 Lady Paton Lady Clark of Calton Lord Glennie OPINION OF LADY PATON in the cause HEATHER CAPITAL LIMITED (in liquidation) and PAUL DUFFY (as liquidator) Pursuer and Reclaimer against LEVY & McRAE and others Defenders and Respondents and HEATHER CAPITAL LIMITED (in liquidation) and PAUL DUFFY (as liquidator) Pursuer… [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 11:44 am
Cedar Valley Exteriors, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am
Jonathan Masur – "The outcome in Oil States provides a possibly counter-intuitive answer as to whether panel stacking by the PTO director will remain permissible. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 8:10 am
(2) Is this speech regulation state action? [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:58 am
LA Fitness International: Shifting Costs to Seek Fairness in Discovery – Reed Smith – http://bit.ly/NejzAg (Patricia Antezana) Warrantless Phone Search Deemed Unconstitutional; Destroys State’s Murder Case – http://bit.ly/P5BXJW (IT-Lex) We Produced Privileged Documents; Now What? [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 7:08 pm
Extension of Emergency State Staffing Flexibility State unemployment offices have temporary, emergency authority to use nonmerit staff through March 14, 2021. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 4:04 pm
Quoting an article by Felix Frankfurter from 1916, and also citing Ernst Freund, Post states that Progressives had repudiated Lochner v. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 5:24 pm
Supreme Court issued its 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 5:25 am
[McKenna’s channeling? [read post]
22 Mar 2025, 8:17 am
Christa Laser (Cleveland State Law) Prof. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 2:01 am
You can spend $130 million a year advertising (Advantage Rent-a-Car v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:16 am
McKenna, Notre Dame Law School & Lucas S. [read post]
2 May 2025, 10:39 am
Even though they seem to push TM use as a stable/important doctrine, they will not lead to a meaningful outcome.Beebe: In terms of taking TM seriously: How could Kagan cite both Janis & Dinwoodie and McKenna & Lemley as stating the same proposition about TM use? [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm
Exxon survey: Nike v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 7:36 am
So long as he is only within the borders of a single state, he's [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 12:55 am
Low-Profile Supreme Court Case Offers Glimpse of Sharp Divide
Legal Times
The case of Bowles v. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 5:02 am
"The first clause has prompted some to wonder whether Madison knew of Donaldson v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 1:01 pm
In Rogers v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 5:02 pm
Abishek Nagaraj: Good job of studying IP free zones v. struggles. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 7:13 am
Rigidity v. flexibility: advocates for more specific defenses. [read post]
