Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 341 - 360
of 21,154
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2018, 2:35 pm
Wallace, Tax Matters Partner v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 9:50 am
“Roe v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 4:00 am
The Texas Attorney General’s November 2010 Comptroller of Public Accounts Case List and Summary of Issues (updated through December 29, 2010), published at the end of December, mentioned the sales tax refund lawsuit of Zale Delaware, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2008, 8:06 pm
The Court does note a series of decisions which run counter to the reasoning in United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
Following up on yesterday's post, Law Profs Weigh In On Supreme Court's Wayfair Decision Clearing The Way For Sales Tax Collections From Out Of State Online Retailers: TaxProf Blog op-ed: South Dakota v. [read post]
13 Aug 2016, 2:24 pm
See Woods, et al. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 8:40 am
The test is the result of 25-year-old Supreme Court ruling in Quill Corp. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:16 am
The defendant asks: Whether the “on sale” bar found in § 102(b) applies only to sales or offers of sale made available to the public, as Congress, this Court, and the United States have all made clear, or whether it also applies to non-public sales or offers of sale, as the Federal Circuit has held. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 12:40 pm
The case, South Dakota v. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
Constitution.Background/Plaintiffs’ Claims in Thompson V. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 1:12 am
Under Omega v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 9:48 am
Ultimately, his case was resolved with four counts of a Class 6 Open Felony for Solicitation of Sale of Unregistered Securities. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 8:46 am
(Lampi, LLC v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 7:17 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 2:43 am
In State of Missouri v. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
A previous post captioned “Texas Sales & Use Tax: no sales tax exemption allowed for purchases of reels on which a supplier delivered wire and cable to its customers” described the Texas Third Court of Appeals’ December 12th decision in Houston Wire & Cable Company v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 7:16 am
The French Supreme Court (Cour de Cassation) put an end to all suspense and resistance, stating it was perfectly legal for a contract to stipulate that the buyer bears the re-sale right royalty in the context of a sale between professionals, thereby siding with the CJEU (here). [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:39 pm
District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Thompson v. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 8:53 am
In Environmental Quality Management Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 10:03 am
In Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. [read post]
