Search for: "Samuel A. Smith" Results 341 - 360 of 814
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 54 [week ending on Sunday 5 July] - Google v Oracle and Microsoft/Kyocera settlement | GC and Nagoya | Life Science IP Summit 2015 | (Kat)onomics of patents | Case T-15/13 Group Nivelles v OHIM | Case T‑521/13 Alpinestars Research Srl v OHIM v Kean Tung Cho and Ling-Yuan Wang Yu | Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc | Multi Time Machine, Inc., v… [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 9:24 pm by Ilya Somin
Smith, one of the three judges on the Fifth Circuit panel that ruled against Murphy on procedural grounds. [read post]
City of Newark, has mostly functioned as a less-than-subtle attempt to undermine the court’s holding in Smith. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 10:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
. #2N, Staten Island Prohibited as of November 10, 2010 Anthony Edmonds Smith Houses, 40 Madison St., Apt. #4G, Manhattan Edison Guerrier Taft Houses, 1694 Madison Ave., Apt. #16A, Manhattan Rocky Harris Red Hook West Houses, 100 Dwight St., Apt. #2B, Brooklyn James Malloy Eastchester Garden Houses, 3010 Yates Ave., Apt. #4G, Bronx Matthew Melendez Morrisania Air Rights Houses, 3204 Park Ave., Apt. #2G, Bronx Shawn Rambert Lincoln Houses, 2130 Madison Ave., Apt.… [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 6:55 pm
Hull nominates #94, #102, #116, #127, #134 and #137.Kevin Thompson nominates #130+130 and #122.Colin Samuels nominates #89, #116, #122, #127, and #134.David Donoghue nominates #95, #106, #126, #127 and #134.Charon QC nominates #115, #116, #131, #125, #134, and #137.Todd Smith nominates #110, #118, #125 and #132.Susan Cartier Liebel nominates #110, #127, #134 and #137.Gideon nominates #117, #124, #125, #127, and #137. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 8:05 am by Paul Horwitz
And Samuels' piece is an odd mix of faith in current doctrine and rejection of the same doctrine. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In Holt, however, the Court stated that “RLUIPA provides greater protection” than the pre-Smith deferential decisions.Pre-Smith cases also allowed substantial deference to military policies. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:50 am by Alan Butler
” Three justices joined Justice Samuel Alito’s concurring opinion, which found that the tracking violated a reasonable expectation of privacy. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 7:42 am by Mark Rienzi
The court could also revisit or narrow Smith in Fulton v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm by Bexis
  We did that not too long ago and came up with a new law review article, Samuel Raymond, “Judicial Politics & Medical Device Preemption After Riegel,” 5 N.Y.U.J.L. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 9:14 am by Dennis Crouch
Guest Post by Professor Amelia Smith Rinehart (University of Utah) Recently, the Federal Circuit held that the New York Times and others infringed patents claiming methods and systems for delivering content to smartphones.[1] In a related Patently-O essay, Professor Sam Ernst states that the Federal Circuit’s opinion in Helferich is “directly contrary to Supreme Court precedent and represents a fundamental misunderstanding of one of the core purposes of the exhaustion doctrine. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 8:57 am by Scott Sagaria
Let’s dig right in, because the celebrities that have filed bankruptcy include Oscar winners (Dorothy Dandridge), corporate moguls (Donald Trump), authors (Samuel L. [read post]