Search for: "Seventh Judicial District Court"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,269
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2013, 5:20 am
In two recent decisions, the Seventh Circuit and a District Court from within the Sixth Circuit joined the growing majority of courts on the issue and held that the common law test, applicable to other types of employment law claims, also applies to determine whether a successor corporation is liable for the FLSA violations of its predecessor. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 8:37 am
District court: No. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 10:11 am
The First acknowledges that it is splitting with the Seventh. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 12:03 pm
Once again, the Seventh Circuit thought the district judge’s take on this incident "was not a factual finding. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 9:31 am
We are not persuaded that the district court failed to recognize that the Guidelines are advisory. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 9:02 am
It is noteworthy that the petitioner waived the right to judicial review of the SEC order at issue as part of a settlement, leading to the First Circuit's affirming the district court's dismissal on those grounds; concerning this point, the petition asserted that structural separation-of-powers violations cannot be waived.The separation of powers angle in Jalbert distinguished that case from the decision last term in Liu v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 11:27 am
Alvarez failedto raise his jury trial and confrontation claims by way of adirect appeal within the tribal court; the Community failed toraise an exhaustion defense in district court. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 8:47 am
The following information is from the public meeting notice: What: Public Meeting Who: Water Users within the Taylor Flat Area When: November 18, 2014, 3:30 pm to 4:30 pmWhere: Moab City Center, 217 East Center Street, Moab, UT 84532, (435)259-5121 Purpose: In accordance with Chapter 73-4, Utah Code Annotated, and the Seventh Judicial District Court (Civil No. 4477), the State Engineer has conducted and distributed a general determination of the rights to the use… [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 5:19 pm
The following information is from the public meeting notice:What: Public MeetingWho: Water Users within the Moab South areaWhen: April 25, 2019, 6:00 to 7:00 pmWhere: Grand Center, 182 North 500 West, MoabPurpose: In accordance with Chapter 73-4, Utah Code Annotated, and the Seventh Judicial District Court (Civil No. 810704477), the State Engineer is authorized and ordered to conduct a general determination of the rights to the use of all water, both… [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 8:44 pm
The following information is from the public meeting notice:What: Public MeetingWho: Water Users within the Moab North areaWhen: April 18, 2018, 6:00 to 7:00 pmWhere: Grand Center, 182 North 500 West, MoabPurpose: In accordance with Chapter 73-4, Utah Code Annotated, and the Seventh Judicial District Court (Civil No. 810704477), the State Engineer is authorized and ordered to conduct a general determination of the rights to the use of all water, both… [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 9:44 am
Information regarding the four public meetings is provided below, along with a map showing the boundaries of the adjudication area.Public Meeting in MonticelloMarch 30, 2022, 4:00 pm to 5:00 pmThe Hideout Community Center648 South Hideout WayMonticello, UtahPublic Meeting in BlandingMarch 30, 2022, 7:00 pm to 8:00 pmUSU Blanding Arts & Events Center715 West 200 SouthBlanding, UtahPublic Meeting in AnethMarch 31, 2022, 10:00 am to 11:00 amAneth Chapter HouseSR 162 and Riverside CtAneth,… [read post]
5 May 2010, 3:04 am
The District Court applied the Gartenberg standard but found that the fees at issue were not disproportionately larger than the fees charged to other clients and by other investment advisers.The Seventh Circuit affirmed, but based on different reasoning. [read post]
5 May 2010, 3:04 am
The District Court applied the Gartenberg standard but found that the fees at issue were not disproportionately larger than the fees charged to other clients and by other investment advisers.The Seventh Circuit affirmed, but based on different reasoning. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 8:30 am
However, the district court dismissed the case – finding that it lacked jurisdiction. [read post]
7 May 2020, 12:57 pm
Referring to Tull‘s holding that the Seventh Amendment applies only to federal—not state—court proceedings, the Nationwide Biweekly majority reinforced that the constitutional right to jury trial in state court civil proceedings is governed only by that state’s own constitution. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 2:02 pm
District court: No harm, no standing. [read post]
5 May 2015, 6:57 am
The district court denied the EEOC’s motion to dismiss the affirmative defense, but certified the issue for immediate appeal. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 8:29 am
Following a trial before the Circuit Court of the Seventh Judicial Circuit in and for Volusia County, the plaintiff obtained a judgment of more than $100,000 against the driver who caused the accident. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:22 am
But, "[m]atters of judicial administration often require district judges to decide factual disputes that are not bound up with the merits of the underlying dispute. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 6:33 am
Defendants petitioned for judicial review at the Fifth Circuit, which held in 2022 that the agency’s decision to have an ALJ adjudicate the case violated the Defendants’ Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial. [read post]
