Search for: "Shah v. Shah" Results 341 - 360 of 605
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Tuesday 7 May, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 11:26 am by INFORRM
On 16 January 2023, there was a trial of preliminary issues in the case of Murtaza Ali Shah v Mohammed Imran and others [2023] EWHC 120 (KB). [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 4:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“If the defendant meets this initial burden, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to raise a question of fact as to whether the statute of limitations has been tolled, an exception to the limitations period is applicable, or the plaintiff actually commenced the action within the applicable limitations period” (Amrusi v Nwaukoni, 155 AD3d 814, 816 [2017] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Shah v Exxis, Inc., 138 AD3d 970, 971 [2016]). [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 3:26 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 6:49 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 2:27 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
Last week in the courts On 16 January 2023, there was a trial of preliminary issue in the case of Shah v Saddique & other (QB-2021-001140) before Steyn J. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:43 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
  There is one appeal listed for January 2018 30 January 2018, Stocker v Stocker Permission Applications Applications for permission to appeal in the following case are awaiting decisions by the single judge Monroe v Hopkins Guise v Shah Lisle-Mainwaring v Associated Newspapers Denman v Associated Newspapers There is an application for permission to appeal to the Supreme Court by some of the defendant which is pending in the case… [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 10:42 pm
Reasons for judgement were released yesterday (Boyd v. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 2:28 pm
In the end, the judgment in Case T-228/02 Organisation des Modjahedines du peuple d'Iran v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:30 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Syed Muhammad Mehr Ali Shah as expert regarding the potential hydrological impact of the KHEP on the reach of the Kishenganga/Neelum River downstream as well as the anticipated impact of the KHEP on the production of electricity by the Neelum-Jhelum Hydro-Electric Project (the “N-JHEP”), Dr. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 12:06 pm by Rajiv Kr. Choudhry
WILLMAR SCHWABE GMBH Abandoned Soumen Ghosh 402/CHENP/2004 SCHERING CORPORATION Revoked T V Madhusudhan 3969/CHENP/2007 TAIYO KAGAKU CO., LTD Granted* T V Madhusudhan 3497/CHENP/2006 VAAKYA TECHNOLOGIES  Granted V Saravanan 2894/CHENP/2007 SILVERBROOK RESEARCH PTY LTD Abandoned V Saravanan 623/MUMNP/2006 OBSCHESTO S OGRANICHENNOI  Granted Vikash Sharma 560/MUMNP/2006 Approtec USA Refused Vikash Sharma 560/MUMNP/2006 Approtec USA … [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 7:04 pm by Michael Froomkin
Watkins/Proctor & Gamble Professor of Law, The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law Nicole Porter, The Sentencing Project Panel III: The Criminalization of Immigration Law Since the Supreme Court’s landmark opinion in INS v. [read post]