Search for: "Sharpe v. Department of Justice"
Results 341 - 360
of 515
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2013, 6:43 pm
Brown v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 11:21 am
Consider this brief exchange between Justice Department Tax Division lawyer Gilbert Rothenberg and the panel: Panel: That’s how many years? [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
Although it was the product of a 2-1 split decision, the ruling in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:56 pm
Sharpe, 347 U. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
The Facts in Vance v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
” Goldsmith agreed* with Wittes’s assessment and noted that, despite the “sharp rhetoric of the policy objections,” the Obama Administration had not “expended any real political capital in support of i [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
This branch of public lawyers have the opportunity for an extensive career in the criminal law and are afforded a great level of discretion in our liberal criminal justice system. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
This branch of public lawyers have the opportunity for an extensive career in the criminal law and are afforded a great level of discretion in our liberal criminal justice system. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:00 am
The justices had one such example before them at that very moment: the case of Jose Padilla. [read post]
16 May 2013, 2:00 pm
The applicable law Justice Department policy for subpoenas of the press is set out in department regulations, codified at 28 C.F.R. [read post]
3 May 2013, 3:57 am
Marshall (citing the same Justice Black opinion from Reid v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am
Robert Sharp, also of English PEN, has dissected some of the detail here and here. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
KEEWATIN v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 4:26 pm
Additionally, the Department of Justice argues that under the current law, messages are unprotected if they are opened, read, or in the trash or drafts folder. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:03 pm
Agency for International Development v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am
Since our last round up, Mrs Justice Sharp has been appointed to the Court of Appeal. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 2:04 am
A recent decision by a Manhattan trial judge in Holdrum Investments, N.V. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am
In Windsor, by contrast, although the Department of Justice agreed with the district court’s decision to issue a judgment against the defendant, the United States, requiring it to pay damages to the plaintiff, it then appealed from that judgment on behalf of the United States. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 7:46 pm
” In 1994, in Dolan v. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 7:52 pm
Jindal Global University; Formerly Professor and Dean, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, India Enforcing Socio-Economic Rights through Public Interest Litigation: An Overview of the Indian Experience 3) Dr Leïla Choukroune, Senior Lecturer in International Economic Law, Faculty of Law, Maastricht University, The Netherlands The Paradox of Justiciability: Labour PIL in China and India Questions/Comments 6:30pm-8:30pm – Welcome Dinner hosted by the City University Law School (by… [read post]
