Search for: "Shelby County Government"
Results 341 - 360
of 495
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2013, 7:17 am
But as the just euphoria over a major civil rights victory at a court that has been quite hostile to civil rights — let us not forget the demise of a significant portion of the Voting Rights Act in Shelby County v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 3:22 pm
As Justice Ginsburg pointed out in her Shelby County dissent, distrust of Congress radiates from the majority’s every page. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 12:02 am
The repetition of that passage in Shelby County suggests that a similar idea is at work. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:00 pm
” One question was whether the federal government’s agreement with Windsor’s position—that Section Three of DOMA is unconstitutional—meant there was no such controversy. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:00 am
Holder, some “centrist” commentators will criticize liberals who love Windsor but hate Shelby County, and conservatives who hold the opposite views, for hypocrisy. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 5:07 pm
On the face of it, what the Court did today in Shelby County seems more modest than what it might have done. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:51 pm
The way that Chief Justice Roberts began his opinion in Shelby County v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:10 pm
Perhaps the biggest surprise of Shelby County is that the majority purported to ignore this Boerne issue. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:10 pm
In Shelby County v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 2:58 pm
In this case in particular, Shelby County does not have the purest record, by a long shot, but it won on the constitutional principle. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 2:47 pm
The majority in Shelby County only addressed the constitutionality of the coverage formula for identifying covered jurisdictions. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 2:30 pm
For those of you who have not yet had time to read Shelby County, but would like a little taste of the key passages: "Under [Respondents'] theory, however, §5 would be effectively immune from scrutiny; no matter how 'clean' the record of covered jurisdictions, the argument could always bemade that it was deterrence that accounted for the good behavior." [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:36 pm
Shelby County, in the covered jurisdiction of Alabama, sought a declaratory judgment that sections 4(b) and 5 are facially unconstitutional. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 11:45 am
” Chief Justice Roberts’ opinion in Voting Rights Act, Section 5 (Art Lien) Today’s decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:04 am
The reason for the Court’s silence is apparent, for as applied to Shelby County, the VRA’s preclearance requirement is hardly contestable. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 7:24 am
Here's the PDF of the opinion in Shelby County. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 7:22 am
Cir.)Docket: Shelby County v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 12:00 am
The Supreme Court's decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 4:06 pm
That question is now squarely before the Court in Shelby County. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:28 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in Shelby County v. [read post]
