Search for: "Short Way Lines v. Thomas" Results 341 - 360 of 567
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
On February 23, 2024, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued its decision in West Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 3:57 pm by Mark Walsh
While the seriatim round was widely viewed as a way to keep Justice Clarence Thomas engaged as he was during telephone arguments, it is Thomas who asks the first question of John Coghlan, the deputy solicitor general of Mississippi. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 6:49 am by Roger Parloff
In essence, he found that the government could not use the charge the way it has, in fact, used it against more than 280 defendants. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 11:23 am by Ilya Somin
But one factor noted by Thomas is whether the weapons in question are "dangerous and unusual" and whether they are being wielded in ways that create "terro [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 6:22 am by Marty Lederman
  This is the way one astute observer put the point:Your claim seems refuted by the empirical reality that most large employers are continuing to choose to provide insurance, rather than dropping their plans and gaining the supposed cost “savings. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Respectfully discuss difficult issues; come to see another’s point of view; imagine possibilities beyond our own short-term self-interest. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Michigan Chamber of Commerce and of the four dissenters in Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton and Leslie C. Griffin
”Although a majority of the Court denied certiorari, Justices Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch would have granted the petition for review. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:48 pm
In short, the company is only an attractive investment without the unions. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:41 pm by Betsy McKenzie
This is a short editorial on the Supreme Court hearing the gun control case, McDonald v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
— Ross Douthat, The New York Times, December 9, 2009 In his column today, my colleague Thomas Friedman argues eloquently for a Dick Cheney-esque, “one percent doctrine” approach to climate change, which would treat caps on greenhouse emissions as a rational way to “buy insurance” against a potentially catastrophic outcome. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 10:46 am by Susan Brenner
For example, the officer could testify that the message was three lines long but could not testify to the contents of the three lines. [read post]