Search for: "Shorts v. Superior Court"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,668
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2014, 9:00 am
The controlling code in D.C. is Superior Court Criminal Rule 32(e) which reads:(e) Withdrawal of plea of guilty. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 2:55 pm
The July 7, 2021, Court of Appeals opinion in Taylor v. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
Little did they know at that time that they would forever be “enshrined” in the New Jersey Superior Court Reporters. [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 8:24 pm
The Superior Court motion decision, summarized on Slaw here, relied on the Arbitration Act, 1991, the International Commercial Arbitration Act, 2017, and case law such as Seidel v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 1:07 pm
Div. 2004), Port Authority v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 6:29 am
State v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:42 pm
In short, this litigation may not be over yet. [read post]
8 Nov 2024, 11:06 am
Another County Court decision does little to advance the cause of action in Australian law, and it obviously remains to be seen if there will be an appeal in this matter such that a superior court will have the opportunity to consider the development of the tort. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 8:10 am
To this, the Court relied on the case of Ciszkowski v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 11:00 pm
District Court Judge William Alsup in Kakani v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 8:33 am
The case, Partridge v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 2:00 am
In a short time, the employee ascending the corporate ladder becomes the superior of the employee with whom she had onboarded. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 2:00 am
In a short time, the employee ascending the corporate ladder becomes the superior of the employee with whom she had onboarded. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 1:37 am
Solera Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 9:17 am
” In 2011, the Superior Court, Appellate Division considered the state’s allegation, in State v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 12:28 pm
In Lickiss v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:13 am
The state has no compelling interest in censoring speech it finds “repugnant,” the court wrote, and the First Amendment does not allow remedying unwanted speech with enforced silence (Honeyfund.com, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 2:33 pm
In both cases, the court determined that this short service warranted a shorter notice period. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 2:33 pm
In both cases, the court determined that this short service warranted a shorter notice period. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 6:15 pm
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice differentiated these different approaches to intermediary liability in Baglow v. [read post]
