Search for: "Smith v. Arizona, State of" Results 341 - 360 of 539
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2013, 3:33 pm by Employment Lawyers
BACKGROUND   Complainant, a transgender woman, was a police detective in Phoenix, Arizona. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:35 am by Joshua Matz
Thompson and Smith v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 1:30 pm by Orin Kerr
Earle, 405 F.3d 278, 286 (5th Cir. 2005) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:04 am
  (The other sex offender case the Court has on its decision docket, but not yet scheduled for argument, is United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 7:45 pm by cdw
” [via LexisOne] Michael Dewayne Smith v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 12:33 pm by Amy Howe
United States, the justices turned down a request to decide whether to overrule the court’s 2005 decision in National Cable Telecommunications Association v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Carl Coleman, Seton Hall University School of Law, Ethical Issues in Managing Vector-Borne Diseases Stacie Kershner, Georgia State University College of Law, Public Health Law and the E-Scooter Epidemic Noah Smith-Drelich, Columbia Law School, Food Tax Substitution Effects B. [read post]
18 May 2015, 8:57 am by WIMS
" <> Turlock Irrigation District v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm by Erin Miller
Arizona (2002), Stevens led the Court in overturning a twelve-year-old precedent, Walton v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:15 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the Sept. 27, Oct. 8 and Oct. 15 conferences) Arizona v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Glocks”: Patient-Physician Relationships, Guns and Free SpeechWendy Parmet, Northeastern University School of Law and School of Public Policy and Urban Affairs , Applying the First Amendment to Physician Speech: A Public Health ApproachChristopher Robertson, University of Arizona James E. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Shea Denning
Arizona, the North Carolina Supreme Court’s decision in State v. [read post]