Search for: "Smith v. State" Results 341 - 360 of 10,841
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2018, 12:43 pm
” (Ibid.)More than 125 years have passed since Abeel, during which many federal and state cases, beginning with the high court’s decision in Jacobson v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 12:26 pm by Vin Bonventre
Smith Opinion Prior to discussing the Supreme Court's three recent church-state decisions in the immediately preceding post (see Part 1a--addendum), we discussed the status of federal free exercise protections. [read post]
29 May 2018, 9:22 am by Patent Docs
Specifically, Judge Newman's concerns involve separation of powers issues and accordingly, are different from the issues raised in Oil States Energy Services, LLC. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 8:21 am
In this case, the CCA addresses a question of first impression: is a search warrant valid if the affiant swore before the magistrate that the facts within the affidavit seeking the search warrant were true, but failed to sign the affidavit? [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 1:56 am by sally
“Read the full judgment from the UK Supreme Court that found that British troops deployed abroad are not protected by the Human Rights Act outside of military bases. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 7:10 am by Stephanie Ziegler
Smith stated that "it is the responsibility of the jury—not the court—to decide what conclusions should [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 7:10 am by Stephanie Ziegler
Smith stated that "it is the responsibility of the jury—not the court—to decide what conclusions should [read blog]
16 Jan 2012, 2:30 pm by admin
Smith appealed his guilty verdicts to the United States Supreme Court, which reversed the convictions. [read post]
The appellate court had upheld a federal judge’s decision in Alabama on Wednesday, which had denied Smith’s request for a preliminary injunction to examine the state’s new execution method. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 12:22 pm by Eileen McDermott
The Court has consolidated the cases and limited the questions to question one and two in the United States government’s memorandum of July 22 in both Smith & Nephew, Inc., et. al. v. [read post]