Search for: "Smith v. State of Ohio" Results 341 - 360 of 879
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2014, 1:27 pm by Stephen Bilkis
" The United States Supreme Court has defined an ex post facto law as one which "punishes as a crime an act previously committed, which was innocent when done, which makes more burdensome the punishment for a crime, after its commission, or which deprives one charged with sex crimes of any defense available according to law at the time when the act was committed as held in Collins v Youngblood and Beazell v Ohio. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 5:03 am by Susan Brenner
District Court for the Northern District of Ohio 2013). [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
Mitts (Relisted after the 4/15 and 4/22 Conferences) Docket: 10-1000 Issue(s): (1) Whether the State of Ohio offends due process by using the same penalty-phase jury instruction affirmed by this Court in Smith v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 4:28 pm
For the reasons hereinafter stated, we AFFIRM that decision. 07a0124p.06 2007/04/05  Cress v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
Williams… In State v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 1:14 pm
The New York Court of Appeals has issued its opinion in Goldstein v. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 10:03 am
State of Ohio     Southern District of Ohio at Columbus 08a0737n.06  Heartwood v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 8:18 pm
Smith (1990), here. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:28 am by Russ Bensing
In Columbus, the only opinion of note was State v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:32 am by Russ Bensing
®  In State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc., 763 N.E.2d 160, 164 (Ohio 2002); Tracy v. [read post]