Search for: "Sorrels v. Sorrels"
Results 341 - 360
of 401
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2011, 8:43 pm
Sorrell limits. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 8:20 am
U.S. (10-5238) — right to benefit from change in state law defining serious drug crime for purposes of enhanced federal career criminal sentence Tuesday, April 26: Sorrell v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 3:48 pm
Court of Appeals in Boston (CCH Privacy Law in Marketing ¶60,270 and CCH Privacy Law in Marketing ¶60,527, respectively).The petition is Sorrell v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 12:27 am
Sophie Dahl v Express Newspapers, 2009 (counsel for the Claimant in passing off and data protection claim) Sir Martin Sorrell v Bennatti & others, 2007 (junior counsel for Sir Martin Sorrell in the first joint Internet libel and privacy case in relation to online publications) Gina Ford v Mumsnet, 2007 (counsel for Gina Ford in this case involving publications on an Internet message board) Victor Chandler (International) & Ors v Murray… [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 6:19 am
Carrigan and Sorrell v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:35 am
Savage summarized the New England prescription data-mining case Sorrell v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 2:33 pm
As we predicted it might, two months ago when we discussed IMS Health, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 1:15 pm
John Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 12:19 pm
That state law does not apply to members of the state legislature, but clearly does apply to other elected officials at the state and local level. ** The prescription records case, Sorrell v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
John Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:54 pm
Sorrell, ___ F.3d ___, 2010 WL 4723183 (2d Cir. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 11:25 am
Today’s petition of the day is below (NOTE: Akin Gump represents the respondents in this case): Note: Akin Gump represents the respondents in this case.Title: Sorrell v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 7:54 pm
Sorrell, CCH Privacy Law in Marketing ¶60,558. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 6:53 am
See IMS Health Inc. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 4:31 pm
Sorrell (pdf) [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 1:54 pm
In its opinion in IMS v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 1:33 pm
That campaign finance issues represented a judicial quagmire by the time of Randall v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 4:30 am
" Stringfellow v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 11:46 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 3:36 am
Co. v Sorrell, 258 AD2d 782, 783 [1999]), and where it is clear from the language of an agreement that the parties intended to be bound and there exists an objective method for supplying a missing term, the court should endeavor to hold the parties to their bargain (166 Mamaroneck Ave., 78 NY2d at 91; see also Cobble Hill Nursing Home v Henry & Warren Corp., 74 NY2d 475, 483 [1989] cert denied 498 US 816 [1990] [before rejecting an agreement as indefinite, a court must… [read post]
