Search for: "Stanley v. Justice Court"
Results 341 - 360
of 505
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2015, 4:43 pm
The case was heard first by Acting Judge Stanley Sapire in the North Gauteng High Court in 2010; then on appeal by the presidency by five judges of the Supreme Court of Appeal in the same year (see the SCA judgment here); then by the Constitutional Court in 2011, who remitted the case to the High Court to take a “judicial peek” at the report (here’s the judgment); then by Judge Joseph Raulinga who took the first judicial peek in 2012;… [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 7:52 am
And the use, as evidence in a criminal proceeding, of facts ascertained by such intrusion must be deemed a violation of the Fifth.I'm always saddened by the fact that Brandeis wrote that ringing paragraph not for the Court in Olmstead v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 3:43 pm
You can find these opinions by searching for cases (like Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 11:52 am
An authority for this proposition was Bowater v NW London Hospitals NHS Trust [2011] IRLR 331, where Stanley Burnton LJ said: The appellant’s conduct was rightly made the subject of disciplinary action. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
On 19 January 2015, Mew J in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice handed down judgment in the libel case of Bernstein v Poon 2015 ONSC 155. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:04 pm
On 29 September 2020 the Press Gazette had a piece on a High Court judge, Mr Justice Williams, agreeing to bar journalists from attending a private trial due to take place in the Family Division of the High Court. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm
He was joined by Arthur Sutherland, who represented the losing party in Nebbia v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 10:02 am
(Anything by Earle Stanley Gardner (Perry Mason); his stories were part of the reason I became a lawyer. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:41 am
It sounds like such a good idea: the pre-eminent legal lexicographer of our time and a Supreme Court Justice together writing a large, detailed treatise on, as they say, “what, in our view, courts ought to do with operative language” of regulations, statutes, and court opinions. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 10:28 pm
Monday's decision in Kapruski v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:45 am
In Middleton v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:40 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 10:50 am
Stanley, 60 N.C. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 8:17 am
” Importantly, it seems quite plausible that Chief Justice Earl Warren, had he not felt compelled to placate Justice Stanley Reed — the last holdout for Jim Crow — could have written a more muscular opinion in Brown. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 12:02 am
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas in an address at the Federalist Society's 25th anniversary conference in Washington, D.C., Thursday. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 5:54 am
Zedeck, Expert Witness in the Legal System: A Scientist’s Search for Justice 49 (2010) (noting that, after remand from the Supreme Court, Joiner v. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 7:15 pm
Stanley, 71 M.J. 60 (C.A.A.F. 2012). [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 9:30 pm
(In the afternoon I make Pierson v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
4 May 2013, 7:40 am
Kaminski: Motivated in part by the puzzle of Stanley v. [read post]
