Search for: "State v. Link" Results 341 - 360 of 24,185
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2023, 11:00 am by Unknown
Opportunities:Global Refugee Forum Linked Event: Multi-Stakeholder Approaches Towards Ending Statelessness, 12 December 2023, Online, 12 December 2023 [info]Call for registration: 2024 World Conference on Statelessness, Kuala Lumpur, 26-29 February 2024 [info]- Note: Tickets are going quickly! [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 5:55 am by George Croner
Those who coined the term “backdoor search” point to a 2019 decision (pp. 68-79), United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:23 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Apache Stronghold (link) asserts Nde Aboriginal and treaty rights to territory purloined by the United States (link) and now managed by the U.S. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:04 am by Frank Cranmer
In Ţîmpău v Romania [2023] ECHR 982, the applicant, Doina Ţîmpău, challenged her dismissal as a lay teacher of Orthodox religion in a public school. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm by Vasiliki Kosta
When the EU acts on education via one of these indirect routes, or when Member State action on education falls within the scope of EU law (as in Commission v. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 4:59 am by Frank Cranmer
Quick links Sarah AlJourani, Lexology: Sharia Series: talaq, talaq, talaq – a triple threat? [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 9:40 am by Amanda Sanders (UK)
    The judge held that the claims in the first claim had two inextricably inter-linked components (the qualifying disclosures and the consequent detriments). [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:30 am by Sherica Celine
Section 1798.140(m) of the CCPA states: “Deidentified” means information that cannot reasonably be used to infer information about, or otherwise be linked to, a particular consumer provided that the business that possesses the information: Takes reasonable measures to ensure that the information cannot be associated with a consumer or household. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 9:09 am by Dennis Crouch
Find that the case is moot and vacate the PTAB decisions upholding the patent under cases such as United States v. [read post]
The HKEX stated that issuers’ boards that are only composed by members of one gender will be in contravention of its Listing Rules. [read post]