Search for: "State California v. Superior Court"
Results 341 - 360
of 4,007
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 8:55 am
” On Aug. 1, 2013, they filed a class-action lawsuit in Los Angeles Superior Court under California Civil Code section 980(a)(2). [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
In Shelby County v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 9:03 pm
A California Superior Court judge ruled that a California law designating gig workers as independent contractors was unconstitutional under the state’s constitution. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 7:14 am
"The action at issue was filed in the California Superior Court, challenging statements made in a software company's IPO registration statement and bringing claims under Securities Act Sections 11, 12(a)(2), and 15. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 4:42 pm
City of Los Angeles etc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 8:52 am
’ The Court cited San Franciscans Upholding the Downtown Plan v. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 10:20 am
Berni v. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 9:58 am
That case involved 678 individual product liability claims joined together in a California state court based mass action. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 5:00 am
Superior Court, (4 Cal. 5th 9013 (2018)), the ABC standard was later a feature of Assembly Bill 5 (AB-5), enacted and codified as Section 2750.3 of the California Labor Code. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 9:12 am
Superior Court, 137 S. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 9:12 am
Superior Court, 137 S. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 3:00 am
The Court of Appeal denied his challenge of the superior court’s order and defendant filed petition of review with the California Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 3:00 am
The Court of Appeal denied his challenge of the superior court’s order and defendant filed petition of review with the California Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 11:57 am
Superior Court of California (Nov. 9): Whether the “discovery-stay provision” of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, which provides (as the name suggests) for a stay of discovery while a motion to dismiss is pending “[i]n any private action arising under” the Securities Act of 1933 applies to private cases in federal and state courts, or only to private cases in federal courts. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 11:33 am
This finding aligns with the 2018 Superior Court of California decision in Thurston v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 11:33 am
This finding aligns with the 2018 Superior Court of California decision in Thurston v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 11:33 am
This finding aligns with the 2018 Superior Court of California decision in Thurston v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:44 pm
(See People v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm
Scilex Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. [read post]
