Search for: "State in Interest of DH"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,220
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2020, 10:46 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the U.S. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 11:52 am
ICE’s rescission of that recognition failed to consider numerous weighty interests and is itself arbitrary and capricious and an abuse of discretion. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 10:22 am
District Court for the Northern District of California, which barred DHS from enforcing the rule in four states bordering Mexico: California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 10:22 am
Note, however, that this doesn’t mean USCIS or DHS will immediately accept such an application. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 9:07 am
We may soon see litigation that seeks to protect these interests. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Although DHS was not required to make its ultimate decision based solely on these reliance interests, the agency was “required to assess whether there were reliance interests, determine whether they were significant, and weigh any such interests against competing policy concerns. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:06 pm
A letter was issued in early April by interested organizations urging USCIS and DHS to automatically extend work authorization and TPS for all current Yemen and Somalia TPS holders, or at the very least extend the re-registration period for TPS holders from Somalia and Yemen for a total of 180 days. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 12:11 pm
Suspension Clause In my view, DHS v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 1:59 pm
Further, the DACA Opinion held that DHS acted arbitrarily and capriciously by failing to consider reliance interests of DACA beneficiaries, their dependents and other persons and entities associated with them. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
Benjamin EidelsonThis post offers preliminary analysis of DHS v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 10:23 am
It also does not apply to: Lawful permanent residents (green card holders); Spouses or children of U.S. citizens; Workers providing essential services for the U.S. food supply chain; Anyone whose entry is determined by the State Department or DHS to be in the national interest. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:28 pm
Supreme Court Upholds DACA for Now On June 18, 2020, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in DHS v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 12:45 pm
It also does not apply to: Lawful permanent residents (green card holders); Spouses or children of U.S. citizens; Workers providing essential services for the U.S. food supply chain; Anyone whose entry is determined by the State Department or DHS to be in the national interest. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 2:29 pm
Thus, given DHS� [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 7:36 am
In 2014, the Administrative Conference of the United States documented that remand without vacatur has been used more than 70 times by the D.C. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 1:34 pm
DHS ignored DACA recipients’ reliance interests when deciding to rescind the program. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 10:51 am
The Court stated that DHS was in no way required to consider all policy alternatives conceivable. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:03 pm
[The DHS Secretary erred because she rescinded the entire DACA policy, rather than just the parts CJ Roberts suggested might be unlawful] Yesterday, I posted my high-level analysis of DHS v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm
Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) authority. [read post]
