Search for: "State of Minnesota v. District Court"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,678
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2015, 6:09 am
Thus, the employee stated a claim for relief for unpaid wages under Minnesota law. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 7:45 am
I thought I would flag a new case on the subject, State v. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 11:05 am
LEXIS 124412 (D MN, July 25, 2018), a Minnesota federal district court adopted a magistrate's report (2018 U.S. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s 1972 ruling in Baker v. [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 1:40 pm
" State v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 2:00 am
District Court for the District of Minnesota serves as a stark reminder that exempt employees may perform nonexempt work but only if their primary duty remains exempt. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 10:44 am
Mass. 1998)] and a Minnesota state court cited the same movie in 1994 [State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 10:00 am
A Minnesota federal district court dismissed most of his claims but allowed him to proceed with his claim for injunctive relief, subject to its being dismissed as moot as soon as his sentencing hearing was completed and he was transferred back to federal prison where a halal diet was available. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 11:59 am
LEXIS 23498 (D MN, Feb. 21, 2013), a Minnesota federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2013 U.S. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 6:17 am
Still, a Fourth Circuit appellate panel (later reversed on procedural grounds) disagreed with those district court decisions, reasoning that the display of a Confederate flag off the job would indeed be “political” enough to be covered by the statute. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 11:40 am
The subsequent class actions, on behalf of United States customers, were consolidated into the District of Minnesota. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 1:46 pm
There have been insurer-favorable decisions on motions to dismiss in federal courts out of Texas, Florida, Kansas, California, Iowa, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Illinois, Georgia and Minnesota and in state courts in Illinois, Michigan, Florida, California and the District of Columbia. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 8:40 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 6:40 am
Observing that since the Minnesota Supreme Court first recognized the tort of appropriation in 1998, the case law in that area has not been significantly developed, a federal district court in that state found that an employer’s failure to update its webpage, in which it referred to a former employee as a New York Times bestselling author and principal of the company, supported an inference that the company knowingly appropriated the use of his… [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 12:10 pm
She appealed to the First District Court of Appeals, No. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:21 pm
On March 10, 2011, Anne filed a Petition for Dissolution of Marriage, in which she sought custody of M.A.A. and E.T.A., in Minnesota state court in Ramsey County. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 4:30 am
Stringer v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 8:52 am
Windsor, thirteen states (California, Connecticut, Delaware, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington as well as the District of Columbia) had legalized same sex marriages. [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 12:59 pm
The state court case is on appeal at the Tenth District Ohio Court of Appeals. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 11:20 am
Appellant is also admitted to practice in federal court in the District of Colorado, the District of Alaska, the Southern and Western Districts of New York, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth and Tenth Circuits. [read post]
