Search for: "State v Holmes" Results 341 - 360 of 1,556
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2012, 2:10 am by sally
Supreme Court G Hamilton (Tullochgribban Mains) Ltd v The Highland Council & Anor[2012] UKSC 31 (11 July 2012) ANS & Anor v ML [2012] UKSC 30 (11 July 2012) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) BA, R v [2012] EWCA Crim 1529 (11 July 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Keay & Anor v Morris Homes (West Midlands) Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 900 (11 July 2012) Holmes & Anor v Evans & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 941 (11 July 2012) BA & Ors… [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 2:22 pm by Amy Howe
Holm, in which the justices upheld the Minnesota governor’s veto of a congressional map enacted by the state legislature. [read post]
3 May 2011, 7:16 am by Layla Kuhl
In People v Laidler the Court asked the parties to address “whether, for purposes of offense variable 3, Dante Holmes was a victim and, even if Holmes was not a victim, whether the defendant could appropriately be scored 100 points for offense variable 3 on the theory that ‘death result[ed] from the commission of a crime and homicide is not the sentencing offense. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 11:33 am by Brian Shiffrin
In Illinois v Wardlow (528 US 119 [2000]), the United States Supreme Court, by a 5-4 vote, held that a person in a high crime area fleeing at the sight of police is, by itself, sufficient to create reasonable suspicion, under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 2:02 pm by Sandy Levinson
Lee" or by the Supreme Court's decision in Texas v White. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 6:25 am
If just one of these elements is missing, the claim will fail.In Comrie, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Holmes, III, of the Western District of Arkansas accepted the stipulation and remanded the case back to state court. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 12:28 pm by Mark Tushnet
As Justice Holmes famously and correctly noted, the power to hold state statutes (and local ordinances) unconstitutional rests on a different footing. [read post]
14 May 2020, 8:47 am by Smith Eibeler LLC
  The Appellate Division has issued a decision providing further guidance in situations in which a person is subjected to non-employment related discrimination in a case entitled Holmes v. [read post]