Search for: "State v. Amaral"
Results 341 - 360
of 641
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
A year ago, almost to the day, my (co-authored) Verdict column focused on the lessons to be learned from a high-profile and boisterous protest by Stanford Law School students at a Federalist Society Speaker Event featuring Judge Kyle Duncan, a conservative Trump-appointed judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 11:55 am
See Akhil Reed Amar, the Lawfulness of Section 5—and Thus of Section 5, 126 Harv. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:57 am
” At the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History Blog, Akhil Amar and Doug Kendall discuss – among other things – President Abraham Lincoln’s “life in Illinois and the constitutional vision he developed as a lawyer in the Territories” and “Justice Anthony Kennedy’s upbringing in Californiaand its influence on what he may be thinking in the pending” challenges to state bans on same-sex marriage. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
One interesting case to be argued in a couple of months, Elonis v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 12:00 am
However, they, as well as Dean Amar and Professor Mazzone, acknowledge that there is no guarantee.Meanwhile, I'd like to raise a related point about state action. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 5:06 am
There is nothing in Roe v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 6:30 am
Dicta in an early case, Hylton v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:00 pm
It’s true that CFPB v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
The court invoked language from the Supreme Court’s 1968 decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 11:00 pm
Quite apart from these quibbles, there is the difficulty that Silberman, as a lower court judge, is still bound by the Supreme Court's 1939 decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 1:16 pm
Texas, which declared the state's anti-sodomy law unconstitutional. [read post]
16 May 2020, 10:22 am
Trial in Amar v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 3:57 pm
But also of interest--in particular to students of Cuba (and now developed states)--is the examination of the development of the informal sector and its consequences for public law and management. [read post]
14 May 2007, 6:16 am
Bob Egelko of the San Francisco Chronicle writes today about the Jan. 24th 7th Circuit decision in the Indiana case of Mayer v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
United States, 143 Fed. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 11:48 am
That is wrong for the reasons I spelled out in my post on the Volokh Conspiracy last night responding to Professors Akhil Reed Amar and Vikram Amar. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 9:22 pm
Adler) There are quite a few interesting posts on the standing issues in Perry v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 6:00 am
[United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:32 am
”) But as one of us explains today in a Justia column (and as Justice Ginsburg’s majority opinion in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 7:23 am
That's the headline on a May 20, 2020 WaPo article by lawprof Sanford V. [read post]
