Search for: "State v. Atkins"
Results 341 - 360
of 670
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2007, 5:43 pm
See Atkins v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 4:45 pm
Cain13-1433Issue: (1) Whether a state court that considers the evidence presented at a petitioner's penalty phase proceeding as determinative of the petitioner's claim of mental retardation under Atkins v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 11:11 am
Bies Issue: Whether the holding of a state post-conviction hearing to determine the mental capacity of a capital defendant whose death sentence was affirmed before Atkins v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:15 am
Cain 13-1433Issue: (1) Whether a state court that considers the evidence presented at a petitioner’s penalty phase proceeding as determinative of the petitioner’s claim of mental retardation under Atkins v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 3:52 am
Gaines v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 8:07 am
Simpson Issue: Whether a capital defendant may raise a mental retardation claim for the first time on habeas if state proceedings became final before the Court’s decision banning execution of the mentally retarded in Atkins v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:34 pm
Jackson v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
State of Minnesota
• US v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 6:18 am
He argues that “what Georgia — and other states — have done since” the Court’s decision in Atkins v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 6:12 pm
Supreme Court ruled in 2002 that it was unconstitutional to execute offenders with mental retardation in the case of Atkins v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 1:21 pm
State, 2013 WL 2364079 (Minn. 2013)), just to take a few random examples from a cite check of Atkins. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
Islam v Secretary of State for the Home Department, R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Another, ex parte Shah (1999) Nora Honkala72. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 8:13 am
The Court granted cert. in State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 8:17 am
In the 2002 case of Atkins v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 8:17 am
In the 2002 case of Atkins v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 8:35 am
In the 2002 Atkins v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:04 pm
” [via LexisOne] FAVORABLE TO THE PROSECUTION OR EXECUTIONER United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 11:52 am
But Lord Justice Atkins’ conclusion on this limb of the case highlights the near-impossibility, at least in the present state of authority, of doing anything about it if a final look shows the result to be unjust. [read post]
20 May 2011, 10:08 am
Today, in State v. [read post]
