Search for: "State v. Black" Results 341 - 360 of 10,056
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2014, 8:28 am by Jaclyn Belczyk
United States [docket; cert. petition, PDF] the question presented is: "Whether, consistent with the First Amendment and Virginia v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 11:05 am by Breaking Media
Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: California, Election Day, Election Law, Elections, Federalism, Hugo Black, Politics, Righteous Indignation, Sprint Communications Company v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 7:24 am by Glenn Reynolds
In fact, the very same attorney, Steve Rosenbaum, pressed a case against a defendant in United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 9:11 am by Martha Minow
Because Brown v Board of Education made "separate but equal" unconstitutional and inadequate, it's tempting to use the phrase to challenge domestic partnerships in states that ban same-sex marriage. [read post]
16 May 2014, 7:14 pm by Maureen Johnston
United States 13-983 Issue: Whether, consistent with the First Amendment and Virginia v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 7:11 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  If such a defense is found to be warranted, a court may grant a party an adverse inference jury instruction at trial stating that the jury may infer from the opposing party's failure to preserve the black box information that such information would have been adverse to that party's position. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
For example, assertions can reflect a state of mind versus an assertion of truth. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 3:00 am
[This is the eleventh in a series of posts by CrimProf's graduate fellow, Peter Stockburger (University of San Diego Class of 2009), previewing the criminal law and procedure cases scheduled for argument in the U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 8:00 pm by Benson Varghese
There is a four factor-test for whether an area is a curtilage which was established in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 6:15 pm by carie
Then, both sides can ask questions and take turns dismissing jurors using what are called peremptory strikes (the number of strikes varies by state, but it is often enough for one side to eliminate all qualified minorities).In a 1986 case, Batson v. [read post]