Search for: "State v. Board of Valuation" Results 341 - 360 of 468
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
(IP finance) Withdrawing patent applications – a matter of priority (IPKat)   United States US General U.S. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 9:07 am
(China Law Blog) ‘Class’ justice in trademark rights: Lan Kwai Fong (IP Dragon)   Denmark Copenhagen Maritime and Commercial Court: Unilever’s ice cream KING CONE did not infringe Danish trademark KING COOL (Class 46) New Danish rules on valuation of IP (Innovationpartners)   Europe CFI: Lange Uhren watch shape appeal dismissed: Lange Uhren GmbH v OHIM (Class 46) CFI: no similarity between "MANGO adorably" and… [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 2:13 pm by Kevin Kaufman
For example, a business in State A might sell into State B, but for whatever reason that income might not be taxed in State B, a throwback rule would subject the income from the sale into State B to State A’s corporate tax. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:02 pm by Erin F. Fonté and Ferdose al-Taie
Money transmitter regulation in the U.S. is separate from federal money services business registration, and is governed on a state-by-state basis. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
(Michael Geist) Copyright Board’s legal history making (Jeremy de Beer)   China China’s stunning lack of brands (China Law Blog) How much does a copyright holder get when his content is broadcast in China? [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 3:46 am by Peter Mahler
In Morizio v Roeder, 2017 NY Slip Op 50248(U) [Sup Ct Albany County Feb. 17, 2017], Albany County Commercial Division Justice Richard M. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:07 am by Dennis Crouch
One could suggest that the Alice v CLS Bank Supreme Court decision also had an impact. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 10:05 am by Kara OBrien
While the letter makes it clear that a fund board cannot delegate its responsibility to make the required determinations, it expressly states that directors do not have to review each transaction in order to make the required determinations. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 3:03 am by Lynn Jokela
Cydney Posner’s blog provides a good overview of the lawsuit and notes that it’s patterned after the lawsuit challenging California’s board gender diversity law, SB 826: Framed as a “taxpayer suit” much like Crest v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 11:51 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division (DOL) June 27, 2014 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), which would amend the definition of spouse under the current Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA) regulations in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP Spotlight)PharmaIndia: Trade mark assignment under scrutiny in a case of deceptive similarity - Doctor Morepen Limited v Yash Pharma Laboratories Limited: (Mondaq),Arrow v Merck - An early route to market for generics? [read post]