Search for: "State v. Boots" Results 341 - 360 of 853
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2014, 4:00 pm
 On PatLit, Stefano Barazza's thoughtful post on the invalidation of a patent for lip and facial synchronisation of animated characters gives us an insight into life in the United States after Alice v CLS Bank revived the old-fashioned notion that patents are for inventive concepts and not for abstract ideas. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 7:43 am by Joy Waltemath
Affirming the fee award, a Sixth Circuit panel explained that accepting the lower offer was one measure of success (or lack thereof), that Rule 68 did not conflict with the fee-shifting statute at issue, and that the reduction was reasonable (McKelvey v Secretary of United States Army, September 18, 2014, Sutton, J). [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:55 am
The case is Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 7:43 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Warrior Fitness Boot Camp Court: Husband’s Access of Wife’s Email to Obtain Information for Divorce Proceeding is not Outrageous Minnesota Appeals Court Says Tracking Statute Excludes Use of GPS to Track Jointly Owned Vehicle — State v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:04 am by John Day
Defense counsel moved for the out-of-state subpoena and supported the motion with information detailing Dr. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:31 am by Tara Hofbauer
This news follows a recent ruling in Latif v. [read post]
He notes that recruit training favors a stress-based regimen that's modeled on military boot camp rather than on the more relaxed academic setting a minority of police departments still employ. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 9:51 am by Ken White
  Because many of the records are not available online, this step will require boots on the ground near many state and federal courthouses. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 6:59 am
 This Kat has recently received an email from a young friend of his, a fellow blogger to boot, who writes:Every firm should have one"I am an LLB (Hons) and a LLM graduate. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 2:09 am
The case is Case C-97/12 P Louis Vuitton Malletier v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Friis Group International ApS intervening, a ruling of the Eighth Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) of 15 May. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 6:04 am by Joy Waltemath
United States Steel Corp. for deciding whether the items at issue were “clothes” within the meaning of this provision (Rosano v Township of Teaneck, June 10, 2014, Fisher, D). [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:14 pm
IMS Health Inc., 131 S.Ct. 2653, 2659 (2011), and United States v. [read post]