Search for: "State v. Burwell"
Results 341 - 360
of 963
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2016, 9:01 am
On Monday, the state of Texas is due to file its response to a request to block enforcement of its voter ID law (Veasey v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 5:09 am
More commentary on Monday’s ruling in Evenwel v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 6:49 am
The Obergefell discussion also includes United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 5:18 am
” Last week’s decision in Luis v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:00 am
More coverage of Monday’s decision in Evenwel v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:48 am
Commentary on Zubik v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 4:05 am
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 7:22 pm
Burwell, and Michigan v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 4:55 am
United States, holding that the pretrial restraint of a criminal defendant’s untainted asset violates the Sixth Amendment. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 5:11 am
Yesterday the Court issued its decision in Luis v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 11:34 am
United States and United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 5:16 pm
Supreme Court today issued an unusual Order (full text) in Zubik v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 11:40 pm
At the National Conference of State Legislatures, Soronen summarizes last week’s decision in the class action case Tyson Foods v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:27 am
More coverage of Wednesday’s oral arguments in oral arguments in Zubik v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 6:13 am
Burwell (Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act; Health Services)Tuttle v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 3:42 pm
Burwell (Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act; Health Services)Tuttle v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:13 am
At the International Municipal Lawyers Association’s Appellate Practice Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses the State and Local Legal Center’s amicus brief in this Term’s drunk-driving cases, Bernard v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 2:35 pm
The Chief Justice calls Zubik v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 2:13 pm
[in] Burwell v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 12:49 pm
But among the four in the majority in the Burwell v. [read post]
