Search for: "State v. Bush"
Results 341 - 360
of 4,508
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2020, 6:17 am
Qualifications to vote in House and Senate elections are decided by each state, and the Supreme Court affirmed in Bush v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 8:54 am
" Medellin v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 11:40 am
The Supreme Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 7:29 pm
Bush, Civ. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 5:55 am
Beaty and Republic of Iraq v. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 12:52 pm
While individual legislators may have approved of their decisions, no legislature did so.In contrast, one can go back to 2000 and the special session of the Florida legislature that met to consider choosing a slate of electors as Bush v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 7:16 am
I was in state court this morning. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 8:47 am
Bush's war. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm
Hooray for Brett Kavanaugh.Justice Barrett joined in full too, even though she (like Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Kavanaugh) had played a litigation role in Bush v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:02 pm
A little more than a year ago, back in February 2008, a majority of the Supreme Court stated, in Riegel v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 9:14 pm
From Bush v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 2:26 pm
Frederick case and the division it has created between the Bush administration and its allies on the religious right. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 8:54 am
The Bush administration has not answered that question. [read post]
15 Jul 2006, 9:12 am
" Lawyers and members of the construction industry alike will remember last year's Supreme Court decision in Kelo v. [read post]
17 Jun 2007, 5:53 am
If you think the Supreme Court lost its credibility and legitimacy in Bush v. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 9:51 pm
Bush appointed a longtime family friend and former business partner, Fred V. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 1:34 pm
Judge McConnell, a Bush appointee whose nomination was opposed by NWLC, wrote this decision. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 9:00 pm
(And certainly the same could be said for Bush v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 10:00 pm
The Bush II administration's desire to be exempt from the FOIA is made clear in its Motion for a Judgment on the Pleadings (the exhibits thereto are here, here, and here) filed by the White House Office of Administration ("OAH") against this FOIA Complaint of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington ("CREW") in CREW v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:57 am
Bush to the seat vacated by William J. [read post]
