Search for: "State v. Clair"
Results 341 - 360
of 573
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
Is it an autonomous community, like a nation-state? [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
Cain 13-1433Issue: (1) Whether a state court that considers the evidence presented at a petitioner’s penalty phase proceeding as determinative of the petitioner’s claim of mental retardation under Atkins v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:13 am
The position was restated by the Supreme Court in The State (Nicolaou) v An Bord Uchtala [1966] IR 567 when Walsh J opined that “An illegitimate child has the same natural rights as a legitimate child though not necessarily the same legal rights”. [read post]
23 May 2009, 8:54 am
This should cause us all to pause and, as Justice Stevens recently urged in Baze v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 2:38 pm
Clair R. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 9:27 am
Clair Hospital. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 4:14 am
Hugh and defendant Claire Gruppo co-founded defendant Gruppo Levey & Co. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 7:00 am
Also in FISC-related transparency news: the FISC declassified as much as it could of its latest business records telephony metadata program; I wrote about two issues dealt with in that order: Judge Claire Eagan’s “relevance” analysis in her August memorandum, and addressing Supreme Court Justices opinions in United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 8:47 am
Data-Driven Regulatory Governance and Its Distorting Effects V. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:35 am
Clair Intellectual Property Consultants v Canon (Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court C D California: Microsoft Word does not infringe patent claiming user interface that is ‘continuously responsive to user input’ even though the accused interface ‘from the user’s standpoint… remains continuously responsive’: Walker Digital, LLC v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 8:40 am
Section 5 is a computer-specific offence and deals with persons who, without lawful excuse, operate a computer within the State with intent to access any data kept either within or outside the State, or outside the State with intent to access any data kept within the State, whether or not any data is actually accessed. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:45 pm
., v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:56 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 12:37 am
Claire Poppelwell-Scevak, Strasbourg Observers: ‘Until Social Norms Say I Do’: How the Grand Chamber Taketh and Giveth Away in Fedotova and Others v Russia: on the recent case in which the GC ECtHR held that there is a positive obligation under Article 8 for member states to afford some sort of legal recognition and protection to same-sex couples. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:09 am
Hall Street Associates v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 6:31 am
” Commentary on the Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 6:20 am
Trump v. [read post]
