Search for: "State v. Comstock" Results 341 - 360 of 399
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2009, 1:39 pm
Comstock; and we have linked to new petitioners’ briefs in Berghuis v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 1:43 pm by WIMS
Supreme Court which decided the historic case about global warming (Massachusetts, et al. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 3:37 am
 The post led with the 4th Circuit's decision in US v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 7:42 am by Steve Hall
In January, for instance, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 6:04 am
 In January, for instance, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 6:57 am by Erin Miller
O'Brien (08-1569) - Petitioner's brief Friday, Nov. 27: United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 6:58 am by WIMS
Heads of State and Government are now directly involved in climate change discussions to a degree previously unimaginable even a few short years ago. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 8:05 pm by Sex Crimes
Reason Magazine has an interesting article supporting the Respondent in the upcoming United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 6:02 pm by Sex Crimes
Ilya Shapiro (of the Cato Institute) has an interesting post discussing the upcoming Supreme Court argument in United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 6:20 pm by Sex Crimes
Thanks to SCOTUSblog, we see that the Supreme Court has scheduled the oral argument in a list of cases beginning in January 2010, including United State v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 7:41 am
" In his post on the Volokh Conspiracy, Ilya Somin discusses the possible reasons why the Solicitor General, in her petition for certiorari in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 12:07 am
I am currently in the process of drafting an amicus brief in the Supreme Court case of United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 7:10 pm
United States and United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:04 am
  (The other sex offender case the Court has on its decision docket, but not yet scheduled for argument, is United States v. [read post]