Search for: "State v. Crown"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,942
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2007, 2:31 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Nichia Corp v Argos Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 741 (19 July 2007) Avis v Turner & Anor [2007] EWCA Civ 748 (19 July 2007) AWB (Geneva) SA & Anor v North America Steamships Ltd & Anor [2007] EWCA Civ 739 (18 July 2007) Bibi & Ors v Entry Clearance Officer, Dhaka [2007] EWCA Civ 740 (18 July 2007) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Kelly & Anor v R. [2007] EWCA… [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 1:53 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Global Process Systems Inc & Anor v Berhad [2009] EWCA Civ 1398 (17 December 2009) Boots Company Plc v HM Revenue & Customs [2009] EWCA Civ 1396 (17 December 2009) National Navigation Co v Endesa Generacion SA [2009] EWCA Civ 1397 (17 December 2009) Cooper & Ors v Fanmailuk.Com Ltd & Anor [2009] EWCA Civ 1368 (17 December 2009) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Fleet v Fleet [2009] EWHC 3166… [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 12:15 pm
The US Department of Justice (DOJ) Tuesday filed a petition with the Supreme Court seeking a reversal of the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 1:48 pm
Criminal intimidation, under s.423(1), is a hybrid offence, where depending on the circumstances of your case, the Crown can elect to proceed either summarily or by indictment. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 12:52 am
So if the representations made by an applicant turned out to be false, it was not for the Courts to presume that the Crown would have granted the patent based on a more "limited" promise. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 9:39 am
So if the representations made by an applicant turned out to be false, it was not for the Courts to presume that the Crown would have granted the patent based on a more "limited" promise. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:06 am
Those submissions failed in both the Crown Court and the Court of Appeal. [read post]
2 May 2017, 3:29 am
In light of this, Ms Loftus, appearing for the Crown, suggested that the court might offer some guidance.The court stated that in offending of this kind the sentencing court must retain flexibility and gear a sentence to the circumstances of the particular offence or offences and to the circumstances of the particular offender [my favourite answer to any legal questions]. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 5:15 am
Manchester Crown Court [2003] 1 AC 787). [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:59 am
" Biden v. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 5:56 am
In Rahmatullah v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 5:24 pm
In R v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:08 am
Linert et al. v Adrien Foutz, et al., 14-1940. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:50 am
Second, and giving all appropriate weight to what was said in R (C (A Minor)) v Secretary of State for Justice [2008] EWCA Civ 882, [2009] QB 657, and E v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary and another (Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission and others intervening) [2008] UKHL 66, [2009] 1 AC 536, the circumstan [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:09 pm
Not all speech is protected by freedom of expression rights, and not all protest is legitimate in the eyes of the state. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 9:13 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 7:27 am
On March 26, 2020, the Supreme Court of Canada granted leave to appeal the decision of the Alberta Court of Appeal in Canada v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 1:34 am
Significantly, there is no right of appeal to the Crown Court against a decision of the magistrates' to vary (or not to vary) an ASBO; one must either seek judicial review or appeal by way of case stated - Langley v Preston Crown Court [2008] EWHC 2623 (Admin). [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 1:34 am
Significantly, there is no right of appeal to the Crown Court against a decision of the magistrates' to vary (or not to vary) an ASBO; one must either seek judicial review or appeal by way of case stated - Langley v Preston Crown Court [2008] EWHC 2623 (Admin). [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 4:30 am
From Chicago to Santiago: The Formation and Impact of the ‘Chicago Boys and Girls’Robert Van Horn, "Corporate Funders, Edward Levi, and the Rise of Chicago Law and Economics in the 1950s"Paul V. [read post]
