Search for: "State v. David" Results 341 - 360 of 14,224
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2024, 12:50 am by CMS
 In this post David McKie, Partner at CMS, comments on that judgment. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 7:53 am by Guest Contributor
  The argument concerned four applications from industrial polluters and allied States (consolidated under Ohio v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In this regard, Jill Lepore’s fine discussion of Adkins should be compared to David Bernstein’s. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am by centerforartlaw
By Sophia Williams “We’ve filed a lawsuit challenging AI image generators for using artists’ work without consent, credit, or compensation. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Much of the research he presents "has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:04 pm by Howard Knopf
The latest is the landmark ruling by Justice Aylen of the Federal Court in Province of Alberta et al v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 3:44 am by SHG
David French suggested that an admissions process, openly crafted to effectuate intentional racial discrimination, was “race neutral” and constitutional might reflect the Supreme Court’s effort after Students for Fair Admission v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:45 am by INFORRM
On 14 February 2024 there was a strike out/summary judgment application in the case of Chowdhury-v-Secretary of State for the Home Department KB-2023-003368. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Quoting an article by Felix Frankfurter from 1916, and also citing Ernst Freund, Post states that Progressives had repudiated Lochner v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
The following symposium, organized by Professors Mary Ziegler and David Schwartz, takes a hard look at the historical questions surrounding Dobbs v. [read post]