Search for: "State v. Dominic"
Results 341 - 360
of 4,458
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2019, 9:44 am
The bill passed through Alabama’s Republican dominated House of Representatives and Senate with overwhelming majorities. [read post]
13 May 2013, 4:09 pm
In the lead case – City of Riverside v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 6:24 am
Aggravated assaults dominate in Appleton and Green Bay, but are much less prominent in Racine. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 11:18 am
The federal court decided that in a parley bet, although some measure of skill was obviously involved, chance was the "dominant factor" in deciding the outcome of the bet. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 5:00 am
In Gallagher v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 11:33 am
At one point he suggested that Lawrence v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 6:42 am
The key examples of the latter, of course, are Hammer v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 10:55 am
Shelby County v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 6:35 pm
First up was Byrd v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 1:15 pm
He stated that if his request were denied, he would seek to waive counsel and represent himself. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 7:10 pm
See Vance v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:19 am
On the issue of confidentiality in the SEP context, the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf stated, in the Sisvel v. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 7:02 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 11:57 am
Jimenez v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 6:12 am
Pope Francis’s visit to the United States once again dominates Court-related news. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 5:15 pm
Yesterday morning’s argument in Home Depot U.S.A. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 2:00 am
See Wolff v. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 5:45 pm
Justice Cullity’s decision in Banton v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 12:47 am
Ltd v ZTE Corp., ZTE Deutschland GmbH has already attracted a lot of attention, not least because some good souls have rather forgotten that, while the Advocate General is a member of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and his rulings, always influential, are adopted by the CJEU in an estimated 75-80% of intellectual property cases, his Opinions are not actually the rulings of the court. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 7:42 am
But much of the early questioning was dominated by a real-life hypothetical from Justice Kagan, suggesting that petitioner’s reading does not accord with everyday usage. [read post]
