Search for: "State v. Dutch"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,320
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2011, 6:51 am
United States and Hill v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 1:54 pm
Last week, a research note by two Dutch researchers made its way to our desks (via reporters who found the claims intriguing). [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:50 pm
Eugene Kontorovich (Northwestern) — who has guest-blogged here several times — passes along this item about today’s United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 10:08 am
On December 19, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued an order in the case of Doe I v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 9:44 am
Judge Posner held in Apple v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 6:11 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum, which “raises what may be the hottest international law issue now affecting business firms. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 4:37 am
Marcel Pemsel analysed the General Court’s judgment in Apart v EUIPO - S. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 3:23 am
The IP Watchdog gave an overview of the relevant principles non-profit organisations should bear in mind to avoid consumer confusion.The Kluwer Trademark Blog discussed whether descriptive terms in languages which do not hold official EU language status might still be deemed to give rise to a likelihood of confusion where there is nevertheless a significant population in at least one EU Member State which speaks that language - whether that is Russian in Germany or the Baltic… [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 7:42 am
Following his Opinion earlier today in Pez Hejduk [here], AG Cruz Villalón has in fact just issued another one [once again, available in - amongst others - Italian but not English], this being the much-awaited Opinion in Case C-419/13 Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Dutch Supreme Court seeking clarification as to the following:1. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 10:19 am
" According to the newspaper, the Dutch man is facing charges of insult, insulting an official, and insulting a friendly head of state. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 2:26 pm
Next up, a court in the Netherlands ruled that two Dutch patents for processing teff (a kind of grain) are invalid. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 6:44 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 6:40 am
This conclusion is in fact also prompted by the following consideration: if, on the one hand, we accept that solutions like the one of the Dutch Supreme Court in Kecofa v Lancôme, ie that copyright could vest in a perfume, may not be tolerated then, on the other hand, protection could not be denied in a certain work just because it does not belong to one of the categories envisaged by a certain Member State’s list of protectable works. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 5:30 am
Baxter: PTO Reexamination Decision Trumps Prior Decisions by the Federal Circuit http://t.co/i0NyO2l36t -> State AGs blast Google over YouTube ads for illicit products http://t.co/uSJ9k0zQeP -> Google Glass privacy concerns persist in Congress http://t.co/YDvZStJm7t -> State AGs say Google profits from harmful YouTube videosr http://t.co/XfUml6hzrR -> Apple sued over Siri in patent case in China http://t.co/QkVMRNgcO9 -> No Takedown and Staydown in France… [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:11 am
Two new references for preliminary rulings were submitted by Dutch courts recently in GS Media BV v Sanoma Media Netherlands BV and Others (Case C-160/15) and Stichting Brein (Case C-527/15)]. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:20 pm
(Kenneth Anderson) I’ve now had a chance to read a little more closely the decision, majority and concurrence, in Kiobel v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 3:32 am
Royal Dutch Shell, which held that corporations cannot be sued under the ATS. [read post]
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, Berg v. Kingdom of the Netherlands, Docket No. 20-1765
17 Feb 2022, 3:53 pm
” Wye Oak Tech., Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 5:07 pm
The decision of the Dutch District Court, The Hague, handed down this Thursday, nullified the Dutch part of the European patent and the Dutch supplementary protection certicate (SPC) on grounds of lack of novelty. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 4:17 am
United Steel, etc. v. [read post]
