Search for: "State v. F. L. J." Results 341 - 360 of 2,362
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Mitty J surveyed the various tests for proportionality, articulated in the common law (by Lord Clyde in de Freitas v Permanent Secretary of Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, Lands and Housing [1991] 1 AC 69; in Strasbourg (Sporrong & Lönnroth v Sweden [1982] 5 EHRR 35) and James v United Kingdom [1986] 8EHRR 123. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 11:36 am by K&L Gates
P. 26(f) (United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Utah) District of Vermont Rule 26. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 3:39 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” (Ward v San Diego County Dept. of Social Servs., 691 F Supp 238, 240 [SD Ca 1988].) [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 2:55 am
City of Champaign, 496 F.3d 820, 828 (7th Cir. 2007) (citing Graham v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 8:20 am
Culbro Corp., 399 F.3d 462 (2nd Cir. 2005)].Gutier v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Reasoning a contrario, the Court observed that, '[i]f a sale cut off the right to control a patented seed’s progeny, then (contrary to J. [read post]