Search for: "State v. Folk"
Results 341 - 360
of 3,161
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2013, 8:36 am
In June the United States Supreme Court struck down the federal law commonly known as the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in US v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 2:13 am
State, 643 S.W.2d 709, 718 (Tex. [read post]
29 May 2009, 12:46 am
State, 643 S.W.2d 709, 718 (Tex. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 10:39 am
The case is Karras v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:11 pm
(Eugene Volokh) I blogged last month about my certiorari petition in Herrera v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 3:36 am
Also, in Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:07 pm
Absolutely stunning news today from the state Supreme Court: only one day after hearing oral arguments in State v. [read post]
26 May 2013, 6:52 am
The folks who follow the trial as entertainment know. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 9:05 am
Canning * 17 USC 512(f) Preempts State Law Claims Over Bogus Copyright Takedown Notices–Amaretto v. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
See Elane Photography, LLC v. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 10:03 am
Guantanamera Cigar Co. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 12:04 pm
Even as more conventional forms of entertainment begin to lose their luster, the folks at One First Street consistently offer engaging, family-friendly fare. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 9:04 am
The transition from first-to-invent to first-to-file has involved a number of quirks, the latest is found in SNIPR Technologies Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:05 pm
I was fighting hard for #1 in the competition but at this point I’ll be content just being on the team again If you want to read through the fact pattern that was used in this case, check out State v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 5:43 am
In South Dakota v. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 10:50 am
Although folks had figured out various ways to separate the two, the solutions were not yet cost effective. [read post]
13 May 2013, 1:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 9:57 am
The company was found to have violated the state's Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.Speaking strictly off the record, the spokesperson expressed regret that WIPO had been slow to comment on the IPKat's posts on this matter, but "this should by no means be misinterpreted as a lack of concern or inaction". [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 7:05 am
Adler v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 4:26 pm
By Adam Thimmesch As I’ve previously blogged, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in South Dakota v. [read post]
