Search for: "State v. Hale"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,073
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
James Wolffe QC, now appears in support of the Respondents. 15.16 Lavery QC states that the will of Parliament should not overrule the will of the Irish people and that the triggering of article 50 without their consent would do just that. 15.14 Lavery QC says that Northern Ireland has a complex constitutional settlement that is legally binding as a result of section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998. 15.10 Lavery QC says that section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act… [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 6:42 am
Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 7:20 am
State, 73 Alabama, 366; State v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 2:48 am
Lady Hale gave a concurring judgment in which she agreed with Lord Sumption that, given the need for a practicable and proportionate scheme, bright-line rules are necessary, and that the categories used are proportionate, save as to the two exceptions Lord Sumption identified. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 1:01 pm
” State v. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 7:34 am
The reason that Parliament was wrong was set out in the case of MacDonald v Fernandez where no less a personage than Hale LJ (as she then was) held that an s21 notice was not a notice to quit and hence that the s21 regime fell outside the common law notice to quit regime. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 4:57 am
Lady Hale supported Lord Kerr’s analysis. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:31 pm
From O'Handley v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:16 am
Despite some evidence relating to some conventions, there was insufficient evidence to demonstrate a widespread and consistent state practice. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 3:48 pm
The court applied the Calder effects test, and held it was reasonable for the defendant, in using the plaintiff's name, to expect to be haled into court in the plaintiff's home state. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:42 pm
In a February 9, 2011 post I discussed the case of Too Much Media LLC v. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 9:20 am
Case citation: UMG Recordings v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
Iraq might then be surprised—even unfairly surprised—to be haled into court in the United States on a judgment against the Ministry under French law. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
The view of the minority (Lady Hale, Lord Mance) The minority reasoned from a different starting point. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 8:02 am
State v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:38 am
At paragraph 134, it stated that: “It will be for the Respondent state to implement . . . appropriate general and/or individual measures to fulfil its obligations to secure the rights of the applications and other persons in their position to respect for their private life. [read post]
28 May 2012, 5:08 am
However, the judgment in Lukaszewski & Ors, R (Halligen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 20, handed down by the Supreme Court last week, appears to offer a ray of hope to applicants facing short time limits. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 12:16 pm
Co. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 12:11 pm
Co. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 7:30 am
The case was heard by Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke, Lord Sumption, Lord Reed and Lord Toulson. [read post]
