Search for: "State v. J. N." Results 341 - 360 of 4,230
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2023, 1:29 pm by admin
The distinction between relied upon, and admissible, studies is codified in the Federal Rules of Evidence, and in virtually every state’s evidence law. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 6:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
PLLC 2023 NY Slip Op 50099(U) Decided on February 9, 2023 Supreme Court, New York County Lebovits, J. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
On 10 February 2023, McLean J dismissed an appeal in the case of Safavi-Naini v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 7:04 am
Stulz (Ohio State University), and Zexi Wang (Lancaster University), on Monday, February 6, 2023 Tags: CEOs, Corporate governance, Public Scrutiny, ROA, S&P 500, SEC ESG in 2023: Politics and Polemics Posted by David N. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 7:04 am
Stulz (Ohio State University), and Zexi Wang (Lancaster University), on Monday, February 6, 2023 Tags: CEOs, Corporate governance, Public Scrutiny, ROA, S&P 500, SEC ESG in 2023: Politics and Polemics Posted by David N. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am by admin
  To be sure, there are gaps, inconsistencies, and mistakes, but the statistics chapter should be a must-read for federal (and state) judges. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 1:37 pm by Guest Author
The SEC’s Office of Economic Analysis’ 2009 Study on Section 404 states this point more explicitly: “Section 13(b)(2) of the Exchange Act requires companies to maintain effective ICFR, while Section 404 requires management to report on the effectiveness of ICFR. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Before 1929, all securities markets in the United States were private and thus, dark. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 11:26 am by INFORRM
Last week in the courts On 22 January 2023, Steyn J heard an application in the case of Bukhari v Bukhari (QB-2020-001139). [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 5:44 am by Russell Knight
COMMERCE COM’N, 592 NE 2d 1066 – Ill: Supreme Court 1992 “[J]udges base their findings only on competent evidence. [read post]