Search for: "State v. Jonathan Thomas" Results 341 - 360 of 658
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2016, 2:30 am by Blog Editorial
 Today’s live blog team comprises Ryan Dolby-Stevens (Olswang), Natalie Hall (CMS), Jonathan Scrine (Nabarro), Jack Ballantyne (Olswang), Clementine Bottet (Nabarro) & Cathryn Hopkins (Olswang). 16.32: James Eadie QC submits that any control by Parliament of the royal prerogative has been via express provision. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Jonathan Heawood of Impress writing on Open Democracy has questioned why the BBC is giving licence fee money which is meant to be going towards local journalism to large media groups which have in fact damaged local journalism. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:53 pm by Ronald Collins
Hills, Jr., Bradley Joondeph, Thomas Lambert, Richard Lazarus, J. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, Jonathan Wood discusses the pending cert petition in Christie v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 6:16 am
Karpoff, University of Washington, on Monday, August 15, 2016 Tags: Acquisitions, Agency costs, Antitakeover, Boards of Directors, Entrenchment, Firm valuation, Hostile takeover,Management, Mergers & acquisitions, Poison pills, Shareholder value, Takeover defenses, Takeovers The Law and Brexit III Posted by Thomas J. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:49 pm
The Supreme Court released an opinion today in Voisine v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Baker, challenge to Massachusetts law designating day-care providers as state employees for purposes of unionization] Followup on CRST Van Expedited v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 5:57 am by Jonathan H. Adler
  Jonathan was kind enough to invite me to expand upon my initial thoughts on the 184-page behemoth opinion. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 4:34 am by Amy Howe
” At Townhall, Jonathan Wood weighs in on last week’s ruling in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:50 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Stephen Breyer. [read post]