Search for: "State v. Jordan" Results 341 - 360 of 1,561
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2012, 3:21 am by Kendall Gray
The State Department Foreign Affairs Manuals specifically directs that passport officials not write "Israel" or "Jordan" when recording an American birth in Jerusalem. [read post]
21 May 2018, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
” At Take Care, Leah Litman looks at one aspect of “the sentencing fallout from” Sessions v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:24 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Diarassouba v Urban ;2009 NY Slip Op 09420 ; Decided on December 15, 2009 ;Appellate Division, Second Department  here is what happened: "While the court was in recess and the jury was deliberating, Conrad Jordan, counsel for the plaintiff, communicated to the defendants' counsel, Barry M. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
It is substantially identical to that contained in several other modern extradition treaties including the treaty with Jordan, which recently received Senate advice and consent and is in force. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 1:26 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Attorney General Reference Nos 1 & 6 of 2008 [2008] EWCA Crim 677 (04 March 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Whitehead v Searle [2008] EWCA Civ B1 (temporary reference) (04 April 2008) Gopakumar v General Medical Council [2008] EWCA Civ 309 (09 April 2008) Monro v HM Revenue & Customs [2008] EWCA Civ 306 (09 April 2008) Othman (Jordan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008]… [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:19 am by Marissa Miller
Alabama and Jackson v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 10:25 am by Guest Blogger
Governor of Florida (also known as “Docs v Glocks”). [read post]
5 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article 10 provides that all documents submitted by the Requesting State shall be translated into the language of the Requested State. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 8:08 am by CMS
The Supreme Court noted that, in the High Court Agbaje proceedings, Justice Munby made reference to Jordan v Jordan [1999] EWHC Admin 666 in which Lord Justice Thorpe criticised rule 3.17 of the Family Proceedings Rules 1991 (the relevant legislation prior to the 2010 Rules) which provided for an exparte application where leave is sought under Part III of the 1984 Act. [read post]