Search for: "State v. Killings" Results 341 - 360 of 11,583
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2010, 3:22 am by Ted Frank
On August 1, 1999, a 31-year-old Piper PA-32-260 crashed in Ohio, killing the pilot and three passengers. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 12:39 pm
This scheme appears at odds with the [United States Supreme Court’s] observation that ‘defendants who do not kill, intend to kill, or foresee that life will be taken are categorically less deserving of the most serious forms of punishment than are murderers. . . . [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 10:38 am
[JURIST] Louisiana state prosecutors on Monday petitioned [PDF text] the US Supreme Court to reconsider its June decision in Kennedy v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 8:47 am
The United States Supreme Court has issued an order directing supplemental briefing in the pending case of Panetti v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 10:30 am by Carl Folsom
Barbara Kay Huff won a dismissal of a vehicular homicide charge in State v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 4:27 am by INFORRM
On 23 February 2017, the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division, decided that Christopher Porco, the man convicted in 2006 of killing his father and attempting to kill his mother with an axe while they slept in their home, has a claim under New York’s Civil Rights Law § 50 and 51 (Porco v Lifetime Entertainment Servs., LLC 2017 NY Slip Op 01421). [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 4:03 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Barhanovich, November 4, 2016, United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit More Blog Entries: Wilkins v. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 4:03 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Barhanovich, November 4, 2016, United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit More Blog Entries: Wilkins v. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 5:14 pm by David Oscar Markus
The state prevailed in the trial court, but the state appellate court ruled that the statute was unconstitutional. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 11:51 am by Buckingham
Justice Kennedy invited states to mount a challenge to the bright-line physical test articulated in Quill v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 11:25 am by Michael Oykhman
In R v Stone, 1999 CanLII 688 (SCC), [1999] 2 SCR 290, the Supreme Court of Canada defined automatism as “a state of impaired consciousness. [read post]