Search for: "State v. Levell" Results 341 - 360 of 29,585
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2008, 8:09 pm
The Third Circuit has handed down an interesting Fourth Amendment case, United States v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 10:52 pm by Ellen Podgor
An amici brief was filed by a group of law professors and practitioners in support of three defendants in United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 9:14 am by Tarunabh Khaitan
The latest in this series of cases is the judgment of the Andhra High Court in Muralidhar Rao v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 6:30 pm by Ernster the Virtual Library Cat
  Maples, an  Alabama death row inmate challenging his murder convictions on constitutional grounds (ineffective assistance of counsel) , was represented pro bono at the state level by two lawyers from a prominent New York Law firm. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 3:06 pm
In our previous post, we tried to shed some light on the differences between state and federal courts, and the superior, appellate, and supreme court levels as they pertain to criminal law. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 2:05 am
Every law that alters the legal rules of evidence, and receives less, or different, testimony, than the law required at the time of the commission of the offence, in order to convict the offender. eAdvocate Thought, if it takes several levels of state and federal courts, with qualified lawyers interpreting the law, to decide if a man is guilty, how can that reasonable man be expected to understand the law so that s/he does not violate the law? [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 8:14 am by vforberger
As noted in the article, some solutions at the state level were being discussed and proposed. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 9:22 am by Michael W. Khalili
In what is considered a victory for employers, the Court has narrowed the scope of the term “supervisors” to encompass only those management-level employees who “are empowered” to take “tangible employment actions” (hire, fire, demote, promote, reassignment with significantly different responsibility’s, or a decision causing a significant change of benefits) against lower-level employees, and not managers who merely oversee or direct… [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 11:40 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Colvin, May 19, 2016, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit More Blog Entries: Mabry v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The rationale for judicial avoidance at the federal level does not really apply to state courts. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 5:24 pm by Robert L. Abell
It also appears to run afoul of the analysis in United States v. [read post]