Search for: "State v. Mathe"
Results 341 - 360
of 721
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2010, 12:04 am
Do you owe the same debt to society if you've been here illegally for two years v. twenty years? [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 1:23 pm
See State v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 9:37 am
Here’s the math: * According to U.S. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 7:00 pm
When the math was done, plaintiff was awarded $471,374.24 in attorney fees. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 2:13 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
3 May 2021, 8:03 am
But, doubtful readers, rest assured that Terry v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 4:24 am
And Professor Tribe's tweet didn't deny that Eastman's math was right. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 12:31 pm
In United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 7:47 pm
Amidst all the angst and uncertainty following the Supreme Court’s decision in Alice Corp. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 7:44 am
In Gill v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 10:19 am
STEM Visa Act of 2011 (S. 1986) – amends the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) to promote innovation, investment and research in the United States. 3. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
Katfriend Nicoletta Epaminonda takes a loot at the Cypriot transposition of the Trade Mark Directive 2015/2436 and reflects on what the future might hold for trade marks in this Member State. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 1:49 pm
” Gonzalez v. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 3:10 am
On this third point, Mr Justice Birss (as he then was) provided an explanation as to the German injunction gap and the interaction with UK patent proceedings at [14]-[19] of his decision, summarizing previous decisions (HTC v Apple, ZTE, v Ericsson, Garmin v Phillips) where Mr Justice Arnold (as he then was) consistently expressed the view that the presence of a possible German injunction gap "was a factor to take into account". [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 8:06 am
Rausch v. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 8:47 pm
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 7:34 pm
In Kentucky Retirement Systems v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 8:34 pm
In Kentucky Retirement Systems v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 9:01 pm
The question arose because of a 1982 ruling by the Ninth Circuit in Kouba v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 5:01 am
” In Gravel v. [read post]
