Search for: "State v. Palmer" Results 341 - 360 of 706
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Although the Supreme Court held that a state could not simply privatize its public schools and thereby evade Brown’s desegregation mandate (because the schools remained public in key respects), in Palmer v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 6:23 am by Marc Randazza
The impetus for this law is a Utah federal case, Palmer v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 6:04 am by Amanda Rice
” At the Arizona Capitol Times, Christian Palmer considers the consolidated campaign finance cases, Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom PAC v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 8:00 am by Robert Tanha
 The Court held that the documents would not meet the test for the introduction of fresh evidence on appeal, set out in R v Palmer. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 12:25 am
We agree with the defendant that the evidence at trial, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), was legally insufficient to establish that he acted with the culpable mental state of depraved indifference to human life at the time he collided with the complainants' vehicles and, thus, did not support his conviction of assault in the first degree (see Penal Law § 120.10[3]; People v Feingold, 7 NY3d 288;… [read post]
25 May 2011, 7:35 am by Adam Chandler
For a second day, media outlets are flush with analysis of Monday’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 8:03 am
Cline's attorney, Robert Palmer, who has filed many suits in other states over exposure to toxic chemicals, said all other states have a time limit that begins when a person learns of an illness. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
This is despite the high threshold for injurious falsehood claims, requiring a plaintiff to prove all of the following elements; a false statement about the plaintiff’s goods or business (falsity); publication of the statement by the defendant to a third party; malice; and actual damage (Palmer Bruyn & Parker Pty Ltd v Parsons (2001) 208 CLR 388 [52]). [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 4:52 pm by Jon Ibanez
Three years later in the case of Michigan Department of State Police v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 8:06 am by Jon Ibanez
  Three years later in the case of Michigan Department of State Police v. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 8:50 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
[emphasis added] Canadian courts historically considered the “best interests of the corporation” in cases like Palmer v. [read post]