Search for: "State v. Parente"
Results 341 - 360
of 14,558
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2014, 6:19 am
State v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 3:04 am
For judgment, please download: [2013] UKSC 74 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New judgment: Zoumbas v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] UKSC 74 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 3:04 am
For judgment, please download: [2013] UKSC 74 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New judgment: Zoumbas v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] UKSC 74 appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 12:59 pm
While the two children remained in resource homes, the parents were removed from the United States. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:30 am
(Citing Shaw v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 4:57 pm
In Pamela T. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 8:29 am
The case is known only by the initials of the two women involved — V.L. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 8:16 pm
The 2009 Florida case Embry v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 9:39 am
The Court of Appeals issued a published decision in Stankevich v Milliron (Docket No. 310710), holding that, after the United States Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v Hodges, ___ US ___; 135 S Ct 2584; 192 L Ed 2d 609 (2015), same-sex couples who are married, in this state or others, may assert the equitable parent doctrine. [read post]
Moves by a Custodial Parent Within the State and Outside of the State - What are the Considerations?
8 Sep 2008, 2:36 am
INTERSTATE MOVE N.J.S.A. 9:2-2 is designed to protect the parenting relationship between a child and a noncustodial parent when the custodial parent seeks to move to another state. [read post]
12 May 2023, 10:59 am
Most recently in Brown v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 12:30 pm
The 6-0 court, the state’s highest, said that given the legalization of same-sex marriages and other societal changes that have upset the notion of “parents” as being a married man and woman, it was time for it to abandon the precedent it has adhered to since its 1991 ruling in Matter of Alison D. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 4:56 am
Ed. 2d 158 (1968) (per curiam); State v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 6:04 am
Malone-Pass v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 7:56 pm
In Mahmoud v. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 10:54 am
The court also stated that section 21(2) of the Children’s Law Reform Act is very broad: “any person…may apply to a court for a parenting order…”. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 7:31 pm
In the case of Davila v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 9:21 pm
In State of Tennessee, ex rel, Price v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm
For example, in Hurst v. [read post]
