Search for: "State v. Peace" Results 341 - 360 of 4,256
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2023, 12:22 am by INFORRM
In a press release, the Met stated that the arrests were for affray, public order offenses, breach of the peace and conspiracy to cause a public nuisance. [read post]
5 May 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Harris v McRae held that a ‘negative’ right to abortion required no positive state funding, upholding the Hyde Amendment that excluded funding coverage for medically necessary abortions from an otherwise comprehensive Medicaid program. [read post]
4 May 2023, 12:17 am by Frank Cranmer
Nabokikh and Others v Russia [2023] ECHR 97 was about the disruption of Jehovah’s Witnesses’ religious meetings. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 2:39 pm by Josh Blackman
(He has a bad habit of ignoring unhelpful precedent; See U.S. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 1:01 pm by Joe Mullin
EFF will continue to advocate for strong anti-SLAPP laws at the state and federal level. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Openness, empathy, tolerance, generosity are essential ingredients for democracy, respect for rights, engagement with others, building ties, and making peace. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 5:00 am by Justin Chan
Fennell, while arguing to the jury that their relationship was a peaceful and happy one and he had no motive to harm or history of harming Ms. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am by Cyberleagle
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]