Search for: "State v. Public Service Commission"
Results 341 - 360
of 5,026
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2024, 11:19 am
”21 In the course of enacting section 54957.95, the Legislature declared its intent not to prohibit criticism of the policies, procedures, programs, or services of the agency, or of the acts or omissions of the legislative body, as provided for in section 54954.3(c).22 In addition, the Legislature declared its intent to “codify the authority and standards for governing public meetings in accordance with Acosta v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 7:37 am
Supreme Court handed down its decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 1:41 pm
ShareMore than 80 amicus briefs were filed in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
The court refers to its prior affirmance of the FCC’s common carrier reclassification decision, United States Telecommunications Ass’n. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
The court refers to its prior affirmance of the FCC’s common carrier reclassification decision, United States Telecommunications Ass’n. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:30 pm
For example, in Goldfarb v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 9:04 am
Importantly, the European Commission recently clarified that the scope of “transferable securities” also extends to crypto-assets. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 9:05 pm
Illinois Commerce Commission, where the Court defined public use as occurring where the company held itself out as the one providing the service. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:00 am
The Commission will receive public comments and hold hearings on the Governor’s reorganization proposal. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 3:04 pm
United States (Bureau of Indian Affairs; 638 Contract) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.htmlMakah Indian Tribe v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 1:10 am
Chapter V of the Regulation authorizes public sector bodies and Union institutions, agencies or bodies to request access to data from data holders if they demonstrate an “exceptional need” to use the data requested. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
As the United States Supreme Court noted in Packingham v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
As the United States Supreme Court noted in Packingham v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
See Monetta Financial Services, Inc., v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 12:00 am
Dink v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 7:03 am
Public Service Commission of Wisconsin, 2014 WL 1182687 (WI 3/25/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://www.wicourts.gov/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html? [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 3:16 am
Individual dismissed employee pursuant to Civil Service Law §71 may apply for reinstatement within one year of the termination of the disabilityStroh v Harrison School District, NYS Sup. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 10:38 am
“No untoward service shrinkages have been documented,” Ginsburg noted, despite the fact that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has consistently maintained that the ADEA applies to small state and local employers, and many state age discrimination laws also cover those employers. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 4:50 pm
County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 1:00 pm
The Court distinguished United States v. [read post]
