Search for: "State v. Ruiz" Results 341 - 360 of 408
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2014, 4:32 am
In this latter regard, it is worth emphasising that in the contested decisions the Board of Appeal cited Develey ('Plastikflaschenform') T-129/04, paragraph 19,  which stated that… where the Board of Appeal finds that the trade mark sought is devoid of intrinsic distinctive character, it may base its analysis on facts arising from practical experience generally acquired from the marketing of general consumer goods which are likely to be known by anyone and are in… [read post]
8 May 2007, 10:37 pm
From my post on scotusblog:The opinion [by the CAFC in KSR] cited Ruiz v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
Cecilia Sbrolli re-imagines the decision in the case Fuller v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 5:31 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Moreover, the lawsuits and changes that ended use of many adult corrections practices among juveniles were largely spawned from reporting from people like Mike Ward, for example in a 2007 article voicing extensive criticisms of pepper spray use in juvenile facilities.Further, the 1984 Morales v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 12:00 pm by CAPTAIN
Hayes, Lisa Lehner, Christine Lopez-Acevedo, Louis V. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 8:05 am by Andrew Hamm
” Alexia Elejalde-Ruiz of Governing reports that the court’s ruling in Janus v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 3:10 am
Confirmed event participants include Mr Justice Birss, Trevor Clarke, Bernt Hugenholtz, Peter Leathem, Cedric Manara and Javier Ruiz. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Hawaii: The so-called ‘Steven Tyler Act’, named after the lead singer of Aerosmith, will be considered in the state Senate Judiciary Committee. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:56 am by R. Scott Adams
As for IHRL, plaintiffs pointed to the right to life under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), and the UN Human Rights Committee’s ruling in AS v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 11:14 am by Helen Klein
The government characterizes it as a factual question—one that (a) the military commission should answer in the first instance (which is why it argues for Councilman abstention), and (b) that can and should be made now in retrospect about the state of affairs in 2000. [read post]