Search for: "State v. Secret"
Results 341 - 360
of 7,626
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2009, 2:52 am
--Court: United States District Court for the District of OregonOpinion Date: 4/28/09Cite: Precision Automation, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 1:09 pm
See Dyer v. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 12:19 pm
Federal and state laws require similar elements to prove misappropriation of trade secrets. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 8:24 pm
" You can access the audio of today's oral argument in Mohamed v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:08 am
In Powder River Basin Resource Council v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:30 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:02 pm
Trade secret is derived from state law. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 11:33 am
Just as the Lanham Act, which coexists with state trademark law, the DTSA coexists with state trade secret law. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:04 pm
Citing Clapper v. [read post]
17 Apr 2006, 11:43 am
The practice was exposed in the Southern District of Florida in 2003, according to this 2004 newspaper article, and declared unconstitutional by 11th Circuit in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 8:21 am
Justice Breyer delivered the opinion for the Court (in part) in United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 10:25 am
Lubin online at visit superlawyers.com DiTommaso Lubin Austermuehle’s Naperville and Schaumburg non-compete agreement litigation attorneys have more than three decades of experience helping clients unravel the complexities of Illinois and out-of-state non-compete and trade secret theft laws. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 9:08 am
MGA Entertainment, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 6:11 am
The recent Arizona Opinion in Orca Communications Unlimited, LLC v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:55 pm
NLRB’s Challenge To Arizona Constitution’s Secret Ballot Provision In NLRB v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 1:29 am
Tram in EdinburghThe IPKat is delighted to host the following guest post, drafted by Andrew McWhirter (Brodies Solicitors) concerning a recent Scottish trade secrets decision: Bilfinger v Edinburgh Tram Inquiry.Here’s what Andrew writes: “It is no secret (amongst local residents at least) that the publicly-funded Edinburgh tram project was seriously delayed, and cost almost double the original estimate at nearly £1 billion. [read post]
4 May 2013, 3:22 pm
United States and Victoria's Secret Direct v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 9:11 am
Noteworthy Trade Secret, Computer Fraud, and Non-Compete Cases In Golden Road Motor Inn, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 6:05 am
The recent opinion of the Sixth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
